» Articles » PMID: 34963128

Human Variation in Error-Based and Reinforcement Motor Learning Is Associated With Entorhinal Volume

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Dec 28
PMID 34963128
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Error-based and reward-based processes are critical for motor learning and are thought to be mediated via distinct neural pathways. However, recent behavioral work in humans suggests that both learning processes can be bolstered by the use of cognitive strategies, which may mediate individual differences in motor learning ability. It has been speculated that medial temporal lobe regions, which have been shown to support motor sequence learning, also support the use of cognitive strategies in error-based and reinforcement motor learning. However, direct evidence in support of this idea remains sparse. Here we first show that better overall learning during error-based visuomotor adaptation is associated with better overall learning during the reward-based shaping of reaching movements. Given the cognitive contribution to learning in both of these tasks, these results support the notion that strategic processes, associated with better performance, drive intersubject variation in both error-based and reinforcement motor learning. Furthermore, we show that entorhinal cortex volume is larger in better learning individuals-characterized across both motor learning tasks-compared with their poorer learning counterparts. These results suggest that individual differences in learning performance during error and reinforcement learning are related to neuroanatomical differences in entorhinal cortex.

Citing Articles

Distinct patterns of connectivity with the motor cortex reflect different components of sensorimotor learning.

Areshenkoff C, de Brouwer A, Gale D, Nashed J, Smallwood J, Flanagan J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(12):e3002934.

PMID: 39625995 PMC: 11644839. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002934.


Reconfigurations of cortical manifold structure during reward-based motor learning.

Nick Q, Gale D, Areshenkoff C, De Brouwer A, Nashed J, Wammes J Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38916598 PMC: 11198988. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91928.


Visual stimulation by extensive visual media consumption can be beneficial for motor learning.

Nuernberger M, Finke K, Nuernberger L, Ruiz-Rizzo A, Gaser C, Klingner C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22056.

PMID: 38086999 PMC: 10716399. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49415-4.


Distinct patterns of cortical manifold expansion and contraction underlie human sensorimotor adaptation.

Gale D, Areshenkoff C, Standage D, Nashed J, Markello R, Flanagan J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(52):e2209960119.

PMID: 36538479 PMC: 9907098. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2209960119.


Whole-brain dynamics of human sensorimotor adaptation.

Standage D, Areshenkoff C, Gale D, Nashed J, Flanagan J, Gallivan J Cereb Cortex. 2022; 33(8):4761-4778.

PMID: 36245212 PMC: 10110437. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac378.

References
1.
Jacobs J, Kahana M, Ekstrom A, Mollison M, Fried I . A sense of direction in human entorhinal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(14):6487-92. PMC: 2851993. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911213107. View

2.
Krakauer J, Ghez C, Ghilardi M . Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(2):473-8. PMC: 6725486. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005. View

3.
Dayan P, Balleine B . Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron. 2002; 36(2):285-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00963-7. View

4.
Romero J, Coupe P, Manjon J . HIPS: A new hippocampus subfield segmentation method. Neuroimage. 2017; 163:286-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.049. View

5.
Nau M, Navarro Schroder T, Bellmund J, Doeller C . Hexadirectional coding of visual space in human entorhinal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(2):188-190. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-017-0050-8. View