» Articles » PMID: 34962860

Predicting Neurological Outcome From Electroencephalogram Dynamics in Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest With Deep Learning

Abstract

Objective: Most cardiac arrest patients who are successfully resuscitated are initially comatose due to hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) provides valuable prognostic information. However, prior approaches largely rely on snapshots of the EEG, without taking advantage of temporal information.

Methods: We present a recurrent deep neural network with the goal of capturing temporal dynamics from longitudinal EEG data to predict long-term neurological outcomes. We utilized a large international dataset of continuous EEG recordings from 1,038 cardiac arrest patients from seven hospitals in Europe and the US. Poor outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-5, and good outcome as CPC score 0-2 at 3 to 6-months after cardiac arrest. Model performance is evaluated using 5-fold cross validation.

Results: The proposed approach provides predictions which improve over time, beginning from an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.81) at 12 hours, and reaching 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91) by 66 h after cardiac arrest. At 66 h, (sensitivity, specificity) points of interest on the ROC curve for predicting poor outcomes were (32,99)%, (55,95)%, and (62,90)%, (99,23)%, (95,47)%, and (90,62)%; whereas for predicting good outcome, the corresponding operating points were (17,99)%, (47,95)%, (62,90)%, (99,19)%, (95,48)%, (70,90)%. Moreover, the model provides predicted probabilities that closely match the observed frequencies of good and poor outcomes (calibration error 0.04).

Conclusions And Significance: These findings suggest that accounting for EEG trend information can substantially improve prediction of neurologic outcomes for patients with coma following cardiac arrest.

Citing Articles

Application of multi-feature-based machine learning models to predict neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest.

Ni P, Zhang S, Hu W, Diao M Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100829.

PMID: 39639943 PMC: 11617783. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100829.


Electroencephalogram-based machine learning models to predict neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: A systematic review.

Chen C, Massey S, Kirschen M, Yuan I, Padiyath A, Simpao A Resuscitation. 2023; 194:110049.

PMID: 37972682 PMC: 11023717. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110049.


AI and machine learning in resuscitation: Ongoing research, new concepts, and key challenges.

Okada Y, Mertens M, Liu N, Lam S, Ong M Resusc Plus. 2023; 15:100435.

PMID: 37547540 PMC: 10400904. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100435.


Neurophysiology State Dynamics Underlying Acute Neurologic Recovery After Cardiac Arrest.

Amorim E, Zheng W, Jing J, Ghassemi M, Lee J, Wu O Neurology. 2023; 101(9):e940-e952.

PMID: 37414565 PMC: 10501085. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207537.


Auditory stimulation and deep learning predict awakening from coma after cardiac arrest.

Aellen F, Alnes S, Loosli F, Rossetti A, Zubler F, Lucia M Brain. 2023; 146(2):778-788.

PMID: 36637902 PMC: 9924902. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac340.

References
1.
Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I . Machine Learning in Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(14):1347-1358. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259. View

2.
Rossetti A, Rabinstein A, Oddo M . Neurological prognostication of outcome in patients in coma after cardiac arrest. Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15(6):597-609. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00015-6. View

3.
Hermans M, Westover M, van Putten M, Hirsch L, Gaspard N . Quantification of EEG reactivity in comatose patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 127(1):571-580. PMC: 4885124. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.024. View

4.
Tjepkema-Cloostermans M, da Silva Lourenco C, Ruijter B, Tromp S, Drost G, Kornips F . Outcome Prediction in Postanoxic Coma With Deep Learning. Crit Care Med. 2019; 47(10):1424-1432. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003854. View

5.
Callaway C, Donnino M, Fink E, Geocadin R, Golan E, Kern K . Part 8: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S465-82. PMC: 4959439. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000262. View