Predicting Neurological Outcome From Electroencephalogram Dynamics in Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest With Deep Learning
Overview
Biophysics
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Most cardiac arrest patients who are successfully resuscitated are initially comatose due to hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) provides valuable prognostic information. However, prior approaches largely rely on snapshots of the EEG, without taking advantage of temporal information.
Methods: We present a recurrent deep neural network with the goal of capturing temporal dynamics from longitudinal EEG data to predict long-term neurological outcomes. We utilized a large international dataset of continuous EEG recordings from 1,038 cardiac arrest patients from seven hospitals in Europe and the US. Poor outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-5, and good outcome as CPC score 0-2 at 3 to 6-months after cardiac arrest. Model performance is evaluated using 5-fold cross validation.
Results: The proposed approach provides predictions which improve over time, beginning from an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.81) at 12 hours, and reaching 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91) by 66 h after cardiac arrest. At 66 h, (sensitivity, specificity) points of interest on the ROC curve for predicting poor outcomes were (32,99)%, (55,95)%, and (62,90)%, (99,23)%, (95,47)%, and (90,62)%; whereas for predicting good outcome, the corresponding operating points were (17,99)%, (47,95)%, (62,90)%, (99,19)%, (95,48)%, (70,90)%. Moreover, the model provides predicted probabilities that closely match the observed frequencies of good and poor outcomes (calibration error 0.04).
Conclusions And Significance: These findings suggest that accounting for EEG trend information can substantially improve prediction of neurologic outcomes for patients with coma following cardiac arrest.
Ni P, Zhang S, Hu W, Diao M Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100829.
PMID: 39639943 PMC: 11617783. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100829.
Chen C, Massey S, Kirschen M, Yuan I, Padiyath A, Simpao A Resuscitation. 2023; 194:110049.
PMID: 37972682 PMC: 11023717. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110049.
AI and machine learning in resuscitation: Ongoing research, new concepts, and key challenges.
Okada Y, Mertens M, Liu N, Lam S, Ong M Resusc Plus. 2023; 15:100435.
PMID: 37547540 PMC: 10400904. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100435.
Neurophysiology State Dynamics Underlying Acute Neurologic Recovery After Cardiac Arrest.
Amorim E, Zheng W, Jing J, Ghassemi M, Lee J, Wu O Neurology. 2023; 101(9):e940-e952.
PMID: 37414565 PMC: 10501085. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207537.
Auditory stimulation and deep learning predict awakening from coma after cardiac arrest.
Aellen F, Alnes S, Loosli F, Rossetti A, Zubler F, Lucia M Brain. 2023; 146(2):778-788.
PMID: 36637902 PMC: 9924902. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac340.