» Articles » PMID: 34957169

Development and Validation of a Simplified Prehospital Triage Model Using Neural Network to Predict Mortality in Trauma Patients: The Ability to Follow Commands, Age, Pulse Rate, Systolic Blood Pressure and Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (CAPSO) Model

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Dec 27
PMID 34957169
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most trauma scoring systems with high accuracy are difficult to use quickly in field triage, especially in the case of mass casualty events. We aimed to develop a machine learning model for trauma mortality prediction using variables easy to obtain in the prehospital setting. This was a retrospective prognostic study using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Data from 2013 to 2016 were used for model training and internal testing, and data from 2017 were used for validation. A neural network model (NN-CAPSO) was developed using the ability to follow commands (whether GCS-motor was <6), age, pulse rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and peripheral oxygen saturation, and a new score (the CAPSO score) was developed based on logistic regression. To achieve further simplification, a neural network model with the SBP variable removed (NN-CAPO) was also developed. The discrimination ability of different models and scores was compared based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Furthermore, a reclassification table with three defined risk groups was used to compare NN-CAPSO and other models or scores. The NN-CAPSO had an AUROC of 0.911(95% confidence interval 0.909 to 0.913) in the validation set, which was higher than the other trauma scores available for prehospital settings (all < 0.001). The NN-CAPO and CAPSO score both reached the AUROC of 0.904 (95% confidence interval 0.902 to 0.906), and were no worse than other prehospital trauma scores. Compared with the NN-CAPO, CAPSO score, and the other trauma scores in reclassification tables, NN-CAPSO was found to more accurately classify patients to the right risk groups. The newly developed CAPSO system simplifies the method of consciousness assessment and has the potential to accurately predict trauma patient mortality in the prehospital setting.

Citing Articles

Are crystalloid-based fluid expansion strategies still relevant in the first hours of trauma induced hemorrhagic shock?.

Tubert P, Kalimouttou A, Bouzat P, David J, Gauss T Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):416.

PMID: 39695790 PMC: 11654417. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05185-7.


Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.

Toy J, Warren J, Wilhelm K, Putnam B, Whitfield D, Gausche-Hill M J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024; 5(5):e13251.

PMID: 39234533 PMC: 11372236. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.13251.


Traumatic Brain Injury as an Independent Predictor of Futility in the Early Resuscitation of Patients in Hemorrhagic Shock.

Al-Fadhl M, Karam M, Chen J, Zackariya S, Lain M, Bales J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999481 PMC: 11242176. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133915.


Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adebayo O, Bhuiyan Z, Ahmed Z Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231205736.

PMID: 37822960 PMC: 10563501. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231205736.


Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care.

Peng H, Siddiqui M, Rhind S, Zhang J, da Luz L, Beckett A Mil Med Res. 2023; 10(1):6.

PMID: 36793066 PMC: 9933281. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0.


References
1.
Jeong J, Park Y, Kim D, Kim T, Kang C, Lee S . The new trauma score (NTS): a modification of the revised trauma score for better trauma mortality prediction. BMC Surg. 2017; 17(1):77. PMC: 5496419. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-017-0272-4. View

2.
Riechers 2nd R, Ramage A, Brown W, Kalehua A, Rhee P, Ecklund J . Physician knowledge of the Glasgow Coma Scale. J Neurotrauma. 2005; 22(11):1327-34. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1327. View

3.
Salinas J, Nguyen R, Darrah M, Kramer G, Serio-Melvin M, Mann E . Advanced monitoring and decision support for battlefield critical care environment. US Army Med Dep J. 2011; :73-81. View

4.
Collins G, Reitsma J, Altman D, Moons K . Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(3):148-58. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9736. View

5.
Christodoulou E, Ma J, Collins G, Steyerberg E, Verbakel J, Van Calster B . A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 110:12-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. View