» Articles » PMID: 34956558

Spine Medical Image Segmentation Based on Deep Learning

Overview
Journal J Healthc Eng
Date 2021 Dec 27
PMID 34956558
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim was to further explore the clinical value of deep learning algorithm in the field of spinal medical image segmentation, and this study designed an improved U-shaped network (BN-U-Net) algorithm and applied it to the spinal MRI medical image segmentation of 22 research objects. The application value of this algorithm in MRI image processing was comprehensively evaluated by accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and area under curve (AUC). The results show that the image processing time of fully convolutional network (FCN) algorithm and U-Net algorithm is greater than 6 min, while the processing time of BN-U-Net algorithm is only 5-10 s, and the processing time is significantly shortened ( < 0.05). The Acc, Sen, and Spe results of BN-U-Net segmentation algorithm were 94.54 ± 3.56%, 88.76 ± 2.67%, and 86.27 ± 6.23%, respectively, which were significantly improved compared with FCN algorithm and U-Net algorithm ( < 0.05). In summary, the improved U-Net network algorithm used in this study significantly improves the quality of spinal MRI images by automatic segmentation of MRI images, which is worthy of further promotion in the field of spinal medical image segmentation.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence-assisted magnetic resonance imaging technology in the differential diagnosis and prognosis prediction of endometrial cancer.

Qi X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26878.

PMID: 39506051 PMC: 11541869. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78081-3.


An Automated Multi-scale Feature Fusion Network for Spine Fracture Segmentation Using Computed Tomography Images.

Saeed M, Bin W, Sheng J, Mobarak Albarakati H J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 37(5):2216-2226.

PMID: 38622384 PMC: 11522210. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01091-0.


Using Augmented Reality Technology to Optimize Transfacet Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Report.

Bardeesi A, Tabarestani T, Bergin S, Huang C, Shaffrey C, Wiggins W J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592365 PMC: 10934424. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051513.


Retracted: Spine Medical Image Segmentation Based on Deep Learning.

Healthcare Engineering J J Healthc Eng. 2023; 2023:9810950.

PMID: 37946900 PMC: 10631961. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9810950.


An Automated Deep Learning Approach for Spine Segmentation and Vertebrae Recognition Using Computed Tomography Images.

Saeed M, Dikaios N, Dastgir A, Ali G, Hamid M, Hajjej F Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(16).

PMID: 37627917 PMC: 10453471. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162658.


References
1.
Jones C, Clarke E . Engineering approaches to understanding mechanisms of spinal column injury leading to spinal cord injury. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018; 64:69-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.019. View

2.
Freund P, Seif M, Weiskopf N, Friston K, Fehlings M, Thompson A . MRI in traumatic spinal cord injury: from clinical assessment to neuroimaging biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2019; 18(12):1123-1135. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30138-3. View

3.
Hofmann U, Keller R, Gesicki M, Walter C, Mittag F . Interobserver Reliability When Classifying MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine: Written Instructions Alone Do Not Suffice. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019; 19(3):207-215. PMC: 7553807. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0079. View

4.
Hansen B, Nordberg C, Hansen P, Bliddal H, Griffith J, Fournier G . Weight-bearing MRI of the Lumbar Spine: Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2019; 23(6):621-633. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697937. View

5.
Wang S, Yang D, Rong R, Zhan X, Xiao G . Pathology Image Analysis Using Segmentation Deep Learning Algorithms. Am J Pathol. 2019; 189(9):1686-1698. PMC: 6723214. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.05.007. View