» Articles » PMID: 34955106

'Read for Nutrition' Programme Improves Preschool Children's Liking and Consumption of Target Vegetable

Overview
Date 2021 Dec 27
PMID 34955106
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the 'Read for Nutrition' programme would increase liking and consumption of broccoli (a target vegetable) in preschool children and test acceptability and practicality of the programme.

Design: Pilot pre-post intervention study, where childcare teachers received training and coaching followed by reading the book 'Monsters Don't Eat Broccoli' multiple times with the children during a three-week intervention.

Setting: Five classrooms of Educare, Lincoln, Nebraska in 2018.

Participants: Sixty-nine (11 to 16 children per classroom) preschool-aged children and sixteen teachers (minimum, three per classroom).

Results: Average total consumption of broccoli increased 35 % (0·14 ounces or 0·05th cup) after the 'Read for Nutrition' programme (t = 2·66; P = 0·01; 95 % CIs (0·035, 0·246)) for all children. Proportional consumption increased for children who received ≥ five exposures to the book (t46 = 2·77; P = 0·008). Exposures to the book predicted proportional consumption (β = 0·365; P = 0·002). Liking of broccoli increased (W69 = 2·2, P = 0·03) as well. Teachers rated the programme as acceptable, practical and enjoyable to children and to themselves.

Conclusions: Programmes such as 'Read for Nutrition' have the potential to improve children's vegetable liking and consumption in early care and education settings with only book readings and no exposure to a real vegetable.

Citing Articles

Family child care home providers' perceived difficulty in serving vegetables to children: findings from a multi-method study.

Hasnin S, Dev D, Hillburn C, Sisson S, Tovar A J Nutr Sci. 2025; 14:e21.

PMID: 40028376 PMC: 11867830. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2025.9.


Integration of Food-based Learning With Science in the Preschool Classroom: Implementation Gaps and Opportunities.

Dixon J, Hegde A, Goodell L, Arnold N, Swindle T, Dev D J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023; 55(4):266-284.

PMID: 37028898 PMC: 10083887. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.01.002.

References
1.
Hoppu U, Prinz M, Ojansivu P, Laaksonen O, Sandell M . Impact of sensory-based food education in kindergarten on willingness to eat vegetables and berries. Food Nutr Res. 2015; 59:28795. PMC: 4676364. DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v59.28795. View

2.
Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

3.
Jaramillo S, Yang S, Hughes S, Fisher J, Morales M, Nicklas T . Interactive computerized fruit and vegetable preference measure for African-American and Hispanic preschoolers. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38(6):352-9. PMC: 2276848. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.06.003. View

4.
Hughes C, Gooze R, Finkelstein D, Whitaker R . Barriers to obesity prevention in Head Start. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(3):454-62. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0499. View

5.
Mennella J, Bobowski N . The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences. Physiol Behav. 2015; 152(Pt B):502-7. PMC: 4654709. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.015. View