» Articles » PMID: 34948618

Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Dec 24
PMID 34948618
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite advances in psychotherapy research showing an evidence-base for psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in adolescents, developmentally specific treatment characteristics are under-researched. We aimed to identify interaction structures (IS: reciprocal patterns of in-session interactions involving therapist interventions, patient behaviors, and the therapeutic relationship) and assess associations between IS and outcome. The study cohort comprised 43 adolescents ( = 13.02 years) with nonclinical, internalizing, and comorbid internalizing-externalizing problems in PDT. A total of 123 sessions from different treatment phases were rated based on the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set (APQ). Outcome was assessed with the Brief Problem Monitor-Youth (BPM-Y) administered repeatedly over the treatment course. Principal component analysis of APQ items resulted in five IS, named "Negative Therapeutic Alliance", "Demanding Patient, Accommodating Therapist", "Emotionally Distant Resistant Patient", "Inexpressive Patient, Inviting Therapist", and "Exploratory Psychodynamic Technique" (EPT). Multilevel modeling analyses with Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimations indicated a two-way interaction effect between EPT and problem levels at baseline such that patients with lower problems at baseline showed good outcome in the context of EPT, whereas an inverse relationship was found for patients with higher problems. Findings provide empirical evidence for characteristic components of PDT for adolescents and preliminary answers about who benefits from psychodynamic techniques.

Citing Articles

Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies.

Calderon A, Storeide K, Elvejord C, Nissen-Lie H, Ulberg R, Johnsen Dahl H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24).

PMID: 36554820 PMC: 9779625. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416939.

References
1.
Calderon A, Schneider C, Target M, Midgley N . 'Interaction structures' between depressed adolescents and their therapists in short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018; 24(3):446-461. DOI: 10.1177/1359104518807734. View

2.
Goodyer I, Reynolds S, Barrett B, Byford S, Dubicka B, Hill J . Cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytical psychotherapy versus a brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled.... Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 4(2):109-119. PMC: 5285447. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30378-9. View

3.
Midgley N, Mortimer R, Cirasola A, Batra P, Kennedy E . The Evidence-Base for Psychodynamic Psychotherapy With Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Synthesis. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:662671. PMC: 8110733. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662671. View

4.
Midgley N, Holmes J, Parkinson S, Stapley E, Eatough V, Target M . "Just like talking to someone about like shit in your life and stuff, and they help you": Hopes and expectations for therapy among depressed adolescents. Psychother Res. 2014; 26(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2014.973922. View

5.
Mensi M, Orlandi M, Rogantini C, Borgatti R, Chiappedi M . Effectiveness of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Preadolescents and Adolescents Affected by Psychiatric Disorders. Psychiatry Investig. 2021; 18(10):923-927. PMC: 8542745. DOI: 10.30773/pi.2021.0015. View