» Articles » PMID: 34947422

Reversal of Osseointegration As a Novel Perspective for the Removal of Failed Dental Implants: A Review of Five Patented Methods

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Dec 24
PMID 34947422
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osseointegration is the basis of successful dental implantology and the foundation of cementless arthroplasty and the osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system. Osseointegration has been considered irreversible thus far. However, controlled heating or cooling of dental implants could selectively damage the bone at the bone-implant interface, causing the reversal of osseointegration or "osseodisintegration". This review compares five methods for implant removal, published as patent documents between 2010 and 2018, which have not yet been discussed in the scientific literature. We describe these methods and evaluate their potential for reversing osseointegration. The five methods have several technical and methodological similarities: all methods include a handpiece, a connecting device for coronal access, and a controlling device, as well as the application of mechanical and/or thermal energy. The proposed method of quantifying the temperature with a sensor as the sole means for regulating the process seems inadequate. A database used in one of the methods, however, allows a more precise correlation between a selected implant and the energy needed for its removal, thus avoiding unnecessary trauma to the patient. A flapless, microinvasive, and bone-conserving approach for removing failed dental implants, facilitating successful reimplantation, would benefit dental implantology. These methods could be adapted to cementless medical implants and osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetics. However, for some of the methods discussed herein, further research may be necessary.

Citing Articles

Thermal necrosis-aided dental implant removal: A rabbit model pilot study.

Hasanoglu-Erbasar G, Gungormus M, Alimogullari E, Cayli S, Peker E, Narin A Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023; 28(2):e148-e155.

PMID: 36806024 PMC: 9985942. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.25616.


Effect of thermal osteonecrosis around implants in the rat tibia: numerical and histomorphometric results in context of implant removal.

Kniha K, Hermanns-Sachweh B, Al-Sibai F, Kneer R, Mohlhenrich S, Heitzer M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):22227.

PMID: 36564495 PMC: 9789117. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25581-9.


Non-Destructive Removal of Dental Implant by Using the Cryogenic Method.

Ak B, Eroglu E, Ertugrul A, Batu Ozturk A, Yilmaz S Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(7).

PMID: 35888569 PMC: 9319264. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58070849.

References
1.
Ustaoglu G, Erdal E . Relationship between risk markers for cardiovascular disease and peri-implant diseases. Int J Implant Dent. 2020; 6(1):73. PMC: 7686405. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00273-z. View

2.
Anitua E . A New Approach for Treating Peri-Implantitis: Reversibility of Osseointegration. Dent Today. 2016; 35(2):130-1. View

3.
Derks J, Tomasi C . Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 42 Suppl 16:S158-71. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12334. View

4.
Bianchini M, Galarraga-Vinueza M, Bedoya K, Correa B, Magini R, Schwarz F . Implantoplasty Enhancing Peri-implant Bone Stability Over a 3-Year Follow-up: A Case Series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019; 40(1):e1-e8. DOI: 10.11607/prd.3849. View

5.
Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo M, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo P . Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1:S313-S318. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0739. View