Ultrasound Lesion Detectability As a Distance Between Probability Measures

Overview

Journal IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Nuclear Medicine

Date 2021 Dec 23

PMID 34941507

Citations 3

Authors

Dongwoon Hyun

Gene B Kim

Nick Bottenus

Jeremy J Dahl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Lesion detectability (LD) quantifies how easily a lesion or target can be distinguished from the background. LD is commonly used to assess the performance of new ultrasound imaging methods. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is the most popular measure of LD; however, recent work has exposed its vulnerability to manipulations of dynamic range. The generalized CNR (gCNR) has been proposed as a robust histogram-based alternative that is invariant to such manipulations. Here, we identify key shortcomings of CNR and strengths of gCNR as LD metrics for modern beamformers. Using the measure theory, we pose LD as a distance between empirical probability measures (i.e., histograms) and prove that: 1) gCNR is equal to the total variation distance between probability measures and 2) gCNR is one minus the error rate of the ideal observer. We then explore several consequences of measure-theoretic LD in simulation studies. We find that histogram distances depend on bin selection that LD must be considered in the context of spatial resolution and that many histogram distances are invariant under measure-preserving isomorphisms of the sample space (e.g., dynamic range transformations). Finally, we provide a mathematical interpretation for why quantitative values such as contrast ratio (CR), CNR, and signal-to-noise ratio should not be compared between images with different dynamic ranges or underlying units and demonstrate how histogram matching can be used to reenable such quantitative comparisons.

Citing Articles

High-Resolution Power Doppler Using Null Subtraction Imaging.

Kou Z, Lowerison M, You Q, Wang Y, Song P, Oelze M IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2024; 43(9):3060-3071.

PMID: 38557625 PMC: 11439488. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2024.3383768.

Spatial Coherence Approaches to Distinguish Suspicious Mass Contents in Fundamental and Harmonic Breast Ultrasound Images.

Sharma A, Oluyemi E, Myers K, Ambinder E, Bell M IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2023; 71(1):70-84.

PMID: 37956000 PMC: 10851341. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3332207.

Methods for Enhancing the Robustness of the Generalized Contrast-to-Noise Ratio.

Schlunk S, Byram B IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2023; 70(8):831-842.

PMID: 37363856 PMC: 10481948. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3289157.

References

Nguyen N, Prager R, Insana M . Improvements to ultrasonic beamformer design and implementation derived from the task-based analytical framework. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141(6):4427. DOI: 10.1121/1.4985187. View

Li P, Li M . Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003; 50(2):128-41. DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2003.1182117. View

Rodriguez-Molares A, Rindal O, Dhooge J, Masoy S, Austeng A, Bell M . The Generalized Contrast-to-Noise Ratio: A Formal Definition for Lesion Detectability. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019; 67(4):745-759. PMC: 8354776. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2956855. View

Hyun D, Crowley A, Dahl J . Efficient Strategies for Estimating the Spatial Coherence of Backscatter. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016; 64(3):500-513. PMC: 5453518. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2634004. View

Nguyen N, Abbey C, Insana M . Objective assessment of sonographic: quality II acquisition information spectrum. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012; 32(4):691-8. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2231963. View

Lediju M, Trahey G, Byram B, Dahl J . Short-lag spatial coherence of backscattered echoes: imaging characteristics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011; 58(7):1377-88. PMC: 3172134. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1957. View

Fatemi A, Masoy S, Rodriguez-Molares A . Row-Column-Based Coherence Imaging Using a 2-D Array Transducer: A Row-Based Implementation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020; 67(11):2303-2311. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3001529. View

Abbey C, Nguyen N, Insana M . Optimal beamforming in ultrasound using the ideal observer. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010; 57(8):1782-96. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1616. View

Zemp R, Parry M, Abbey C, Insana M . Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005; 24(3):300-10. PMC: 2715177. DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2004.841226. View

10.

Nguyen N, Abbey C, Insana M . Objective assessment of sonographic quality I: task information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012; 32(4):683-90. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2232303. View

11.

Hyun D, Brickson L, Looby K, Dahl J . Beamforming and Speckle Reduction Using Neural Networks. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019; 66(5):898-910. PMC: 7012504. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2903795. View

12.

Jensen J, Svendsen N . Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1992; 39(2):262-7. DOI: 10.1109/58.139123. View

13.

Patterson M, Foster F . The improvement and quantitative assessment of B-mode images produced by an annular array/cone hybrid. Ultrason Imaging. 1983; 5(3):195-213. DOI: 10.1177/016173468300500301. View

14.

Rindal O, Austeng A, Fatemi A, Rodriguez-Molares A . The Effect of Dynamic Range Alterations in the Estimation of Contrast. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019; 66(7):1198-1208. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2911267. View

15.

Lee Y, Kang J, Yoo Y . Automatic dynamic range adjustment for ultrasound B-mode imaging. Ultrasonics. 2014; 56:435-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.09.012. View

16.

Bottenus N, Byram B, Hyun D . Histogram Matching for Visual Ultrasound Image Comparison. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020; 68(5):1487-1495. PMC: 8136614. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3035965. View

17.

Bottenus N, Ustuner K . Acoustic reciprocity of spatial coherence in ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015; 62(5):852-61. PMC: 4457470. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.006928. View

18.

Matrone G, Stuart Savoia A, Caliano G, Magenes G . The delay multiply and sum beamforming algorithm in ultrasound B-mode medical imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014; 34(4):940-9. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2371235. View

19.

Abbey C, Zemp R, Liu J, Lindfors K, Insana M . Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25(2):198-209. PMC: 2715171. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2005.862205. View

20.

Camacho J, Parrilla M, Fritsch C . Phase coherence imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009; 56(5):958-74. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1128. View