Desire to Play with Counterstereotypical Peers is Related to Gender Stereotypes and Playmate Experiences

Overview

Journal Dev Psychol

Publisher American Psychological Association

Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology

Date 2021 Dec 23

PMID 34941299

Authors

Riley N Sims

Michael T Rizzo

Kelly Lynn Mulvey

Melanie Killen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study investigated the role of children's gender stereotypes and peer playmate experiences in shaping their desire to play with peers who hold counterstereotypical preferences (e.g., a boy who likes dolls or a girl who likes trucks). Children (N = 95; 46 girls, 49 boys; 67% White, 18% Black, 8% Latinx, 4% Asian, 3% other; median household income = $US97,810) who were 4 to 8 years old (M = 6.11 years old, SD = 1.34) were interviewed about their gender stereotypes about toy preferences, how often they engage in counterstereotypical playmate experiences, and their desire to play with peers who hold counterstereotypical toy preferences. Children with less gender stereotype-consistent expectations reported more playmate experiences with children who played with toys that were gender counterstereotypical compared to children with more gender stereotype-consistent expectations. Additionally, children with less gender stereotype-consistent expectations reported a greater desire to play with peers who held counterstereotypical toy preferences compared to children with more gender stereotype-consistent expectations. Younger children's reported playmate experiences with peers who liked toys that were gender counterstereotypical and their desire to play with these peers were strongly related to their gender stereotypical expectations (and more so than for older children). Together, these findings indicate that children's gender stereotypes and peer playmate experiences are related to their desire to play with peers who hold counterstereotypical toy preferences, highlighting the importance of facilitating diverse friendships for promoting inclusive orientations in childhood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

References

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

Abrams D, Rutland A, Cameron L, Ferrell J . Older but wilier: In-group accountability and the development of subjective group dynamics. Dev Psychol. 2007; 43(1):134-48. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.134. View

Rizzo M, Killen M . Theory of mind is related to children's resource allocations in gender stereotypic contexts. Dev Psychol. 2017; 54(3):510-520. PMC: 5826826. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000439. View

Schmidt M, Rakoczy H, Tomasello M . Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation. Cognition. 2012; 124(3):325-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004. View

Mulvey K, Killen M . Challenging gender stereotypes: resistance and exclusion. Child Dev. 2014; 86(3):681-94. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12317. View

Hardecker S, Schmidt M, Roden M, Tomasello M . Young children's behavioral and emotional responses to different social norm violations. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016; 150:364-379. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.012. View

Rutland A, Hitti A, Mulvey K, Abrams D, Killen M . When does the in-group like the out-group? Bias among children as a function of group norms. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(6):834-42. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615572758. View

Mulvey K, Rizzo M, Killen M . Challenging gender stereotypes: Theory of mind and peer group dynamics. Dev Sci. 2015; 19(6):999-1010. PMC: 4808471. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12345. View

Fabes R, Martin C, Hanish L, DeLay D . Gender integration in coeducational classrooms: Advancing educational research and practice. Sch Psychol Q. 2018; 33(2):182-190. DOI: 10.1037/spq0000266. View

10.

Abrams D, Palmer S, Rutland A, Cameron L, Van de Vyver J . Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect. Dev Psychol. 2013; 50(1):258-70. DOI: 10.1037/a0032461. View

11.

Rubin J, Gulgoz S, Alonso D, Olson K . Transgender and Cisgender Children's Stereotypes and Beliefs About Others' Stereotypes. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021; 11(5):638-646. PMC: 8043623. DOI: 10.1177/1948550619879911. View

12.

McGuire L, Rizzo M, Killen M, Rutland A . The Role of Competitive and Cooperative Norms in the Development of Deviant Evaluations. Child Dev. 2018; 90(6):e703-e717. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13094. View

13.

Martin C, Fabes R . The stability and consequences of young children's same-sex peer interactions. Dev Psychol. 2001; 37(3):431-46. View

14.

Cooley S, Killen M . Children's evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms. Dev Psychol. 2015; 51(4):554-63. DOI: 10.1037/a0038796. View

15.

Killen M, Rutland A, Abrams D, Mulvey K, Hitti A . Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms. Child Dev. 2012; 84(3):1063-80. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12011. View

16.

Kwan K, Shi S, Nabbijohn A, MacMullin L, VanderLaan D, Wong W . Children's Appraisals of Gender Nonconformity: Developmental Pattern and Intervention. Child Dev. 2019; 91(4):e780-e798. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13316. View

17.

Olsson M, Martiny S . Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls' and Women's Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2264. PMC: 6292925. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02264. View

18.

Rakoczy H, Brosche N, Warneken F, Tomasello M . Young children's understanding of the context-relativity of normative rules in conventional games. Br J Dev Psychol. 2009; 27(Pt 2):445-56. DOI: 10.1348/026151008x337752. View

19.

Liben L, Bigler R . The developmental course of gender differentiation: conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2002; 67(2):i-viii, 1-147; discussion 148-83. View

20.

Pettigrew T . Intergroup contact theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 49:65-85. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65. View