» Articles » PMID: 34938034

Evaluation of Complacency About Dental Implants with Shared Decision Making and Satisfaction Scores: A Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal Saudi Dent J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Dec 23
PMID 34938034
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The dentist-patient relationship is delicate. Engaging the patient in the dental treatment planning especially for lengthy procedures as dental implants improves the relation as well as treatment outcomes including patient satisfaction. We aimed at evaluating the importance of Shared Decision making (SDM) and level of satisfaction among dental implant patients by employing SDM and satisfaction scores.

Materials & Methods: The present cross-sectional study was pursued between April 2019 to September 2019, among dental implant patients (n = 144) who have completed their prosthetic part of implant treatment with at least 3 months of post-restoration evaluation. Demographic and implant data were collected from electronic filing system (Salud) as well as measurement of SDM score. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 version statistical software.

Results: The mean satisfaction score was higher for implant placement with Periodontists (31.9%). However, among surgical specialist the mean satisfaction score was found to be higher for oral surgeons who had 1-5 years of experience (46.5%). Patients reported that their decision making was greatly influenced by the treating dentist. A statistical significance was found where (64.6%) of Implant patients would like to undergo the procedure again (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Shared decision-making and patient satisfaction enables the treatment delivery to be more effective and ethical, in addition to being patient-centered care.

Citing Articles

Impact of inpatient self-efficacy and trust in physicians on inpatient satisfaction with medical services: the mediating role of patient participation in medical decision-making.

Wang H, Jia J, Fan Y, Chen H, Lou Y, Wang X Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1364319.

PMID: 39282672 PMC: 11392843. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1364319.


Shared decision making for patients needing dentofacial orthopedics, orthognathic surgery, and conventional non-surgical fixed appliance therapy: a comparison between Pakistani patients' and clinicians' perspective.

Najam F, Jeelani W, Ahmed M, Shuja M Dental Press J Orthod. 2024; 29(4):e242443.

PMID: 39230113 PMC: 11368241. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e242443.oar.


Analytical Modeling of the Interaction of a Four Implant-Supported Overdenture with Bone Tissue.

Pelekhan B, Dutkiewicz M, Shatskyi I, Velychkovych A, Rozhko M, Pelekhan L Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(7).

PMID: 35407730 PMC: 8999531. DOI: 10.3390/ma15072398.

References
1.
Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G . Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. II: implant acceptance, patient-perceived costs and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 22(1):106-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01969.x. View

2.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T . Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(5):681-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3. View

3.
Kashbour W, Rousseau N, Ellis J, Thomason J . Patients' experiences of dental implant treatment: A literature review of key qualitative studies. J Dent. 2015; 43(7):789-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.008. View

4.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T . Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49(5):651-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8. View

5.
Khalaf K, Kheder W, El-Kishawi M, AlQahtani H, Ghiasi F, Alabdulkareem M . The role of prosthetic, orthodontic and implant-supported rehabilitation in the management of secondary malocclusion to maxillofacial trauma- A systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33(4):177-183. PMC: 8117368. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.12.004. View