» Articles » PMID: 34932001

An Integrated Model to Improve Medication Reconciliation in Oncology: Prospective Interventional Study

Abstract

Background: Accurate medication reconciliation reduces the risk of drug incompatibilities and adverse events that can occur during transitions in care. Community pharmacies (CPs) are a crucial part of the health care system and could be involved in collecting essential information on conventional and supplementary drugs used at home.

Objective: The aim of this paper was to establish an alliance between our cancer institute, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST), and CPs, the latter entrusted with the completion of a pharmacological recognition survey. We also aimed to integrate the national information technology (IT) platform of CPs with the electronic medical records of IRST.

Methods: Cancer patients undergoing antiblastic treatments were invited to select a CP taking part in the study and to complete the pharmacological recognition step. The information collected by the pharmacist was sent to the electronic medical records of IRST through the new IT platform, after which the oncologist performed the reconciliation process.

Results: A total of 66 CPs completed surveys for 134 patients. An average of 5.9 drugs per patient was used at home, with 12 or more used in the most advanced age groups. Moreover, 60% (80/134) of the patients used nonconventional products or critical foods. Some potential interactions between nonconventional medications and cancer treatments were reported.

Conclusions: In the PROF-1 (Progetto di Rete in Oncologia con le Farmacie di comunità della Romagna) study, an alliance was created between our cancer center and CPs to improve medication reconciliation, and a new integrated IT platform was validated.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04796142; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04796142.

Citing Articles

The Pharmacoeconomic Impact of Pharmaceutical Care in the Hospital: Protocol for an Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Amorim F, Valenca-Feitosa F, Rios M, Souza C, Barros I, de Oliveira-Filho A JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e35865.

PMID: 37083592 PMC: 10163400. DOI: 10.2196/35865.

References
1.
Riechelmann R, Tannock I, Wang L, Saad E, Taback N, Krzyzanowska M . Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(8):592-600. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djk130. View

2.
Broadfield L, Shaheen P, Rogez M, Jamieson K, McCallum M . Guidelines for outpatient cancer care by community pharmacists. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2017; 150(1):24-31. PMC: 5330421. DOI: 10.1177/1715163516680009. View

3.
Qato D, Wilder J, Schumm L, Gillet V, Alexander G . Changes in Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medication and Dietary Supplement Use Among Older Adults in the United States, 2005 vs 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(4):473-82. PMC: 5024734. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8581. View

4.
Kwan J, Lo L, Sampson M, Shojania K . Medication reconciliation during transitions of care as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(5 Pt 2):397-403. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00006. View

5.
Alqenae F, Steinke D, Keers R . Prevalence and Nature of Medication Errors and Medication-Related Harm Following Discharge from Hospital to Community Settings: A Systematic Review. Drug Saf. 2020; 43(6):517-537. PMC: 7235049. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00918-3. View