» Articles » PMID: 34930185

Comparison of Mechanical Properties in Interference Screw Fixation Technique and Organic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Method: a Biomechanical Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2021 Dec 21
PMID 34930185
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bone and Site Hold Tendon Inside (BASHTI) technique is an organic implant-less technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with some clinical advantages, such as speeding up the healing process, over implantable techniques. The study aims to compare the mechanical properties of BASHTI technique with the conventional interference screw technique.

Methods: To investigate the mechanical properties, 20 in-vitro experimental tests were conducted. Synthetic dummy bone, along with fresh digital bovine tendons, as a graft, were used for experiments. Three loading steps were applied to all specimens, including a preconditioning, a main cyclic, and a pull-out loading.

Results: The mechanical characters of an interference screw technique using an 8 mm tendon diameter, including fixation strength, average cyclic stiffness (ACS), and average pull-out stiffness (APS) were found to be 439 ± 132 N, 10.3 ± 5.3 kN/mm, and 109 ± 40 N/mm, respectively. In the case of an interference screw using a 9 mm tendon, the fixation strength, ACS, and APS were obtained 549 ± 87 N, 10.3 ± 4.7 kN/mm, and 91 ± 13 N/mm, respectively. In parallel, the fixation strength, APS, and ACS of BASHTI technique using an 8 mm tendon were 360 ± 123 N, 3.3 ± 0.6 kN/mm, and 79 ± 27 N/mm, respectively, while, for 9 mm tendon 278 ± 103 N, 2.4 ± 1.2 kN/mm, and 111 ± 40 N/mm, were reported for fixation strength, APS, and ACS respectively when BASHTI technique was used.

Conclusion: About 50% of interference screw samples showed superior mechanical properties compared to BASHTI technique, but in another half of the samples, the differences were not significant (N.S.). However, due to organic advantages of BASHTI technique and lower cost, it could be used as a substitute for interference screw technique, especially where fast recovery is expected.

Citing Articles

An innovative anti-rotation tension band wiring for treating transverse patellar fractures: finite element analysis and mechanical testing.

Zhang Z, Sun F, Zhang T, Wen L J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):416.

PMID: 39030623 PMC: 11264867. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04902-w.


Effect of the core bone engaged length on the BASHTI fixation strength, an in-vitro study on bovine tendons using identical-density surrogate bones.

Moeinnia H, Nourani A, Mohseni M, Borjali A, Ghias N, Korani H BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):226.

PMID: 36964514 PMC: 10039572. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06311-2.


Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Titanium Adjustable Loop Button and Poly-L-co-DL-Lactic Acid-Beta Tricalcium Phosphate (PLDLA-bTCP) Interference Screws: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.

Sharma P, Baghel A, Keshav K, Kumar A, Singh A, Singh A Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e34542.

PMID: 36879706 PMC: 9985307. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34542.


Sheathed fixation improves BASHTI technique in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Borjali A, Farrahi G, Chizari M Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2023; 237(3):375-384.

PMID: 36772977 PMC: 10052412. DOI: 10.1177/09544119231153198.


Current strategies for enhancement of the bioactivity of artificial ligaments: A mini-review.

Li S, Wang S, Liu W, Zhang C, Song J J Orthop Translat. 2022; 36:205-215.

PMID: 36263385 PMC: 9576487. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.07.011.

References
1.
Pereira H, Pereira H, Correlo V, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira J, Reis R . Migration of "bioabsorbable" screws in ACL repair. How much do we know? A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(4):986-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2414-2. View

2.
Kulczycka P, Larbi A, Malghem J, Thienpont E, Vande Berg B, Lecouvet F . Imaging ACL reconstructions and their complications. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014; 96(1):11-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.04.007. View

3.
Markatos K, Kaseta M, Lallos S, Korres D, Efstathopoulos N . The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013; 23(7):747-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-1079-8. View

4.
Gobbi A, Diara A, Mahajan S, Zanazzo M, Tuy B . Patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with conical press-fit femoral fixation: 5-year results in athletes population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002; 10(2):73-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-001-0265-8. View

5.
Daneshvarhashjin N, Chizari M, Mortazavi J, Rouhi G . Can the body slope of interference screw affect initial stability of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament?: An in-vitro investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):556. PMC: 8214255. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04446-8. View