» Articles » PMID: 34927161

Registration Attendants Show Poor Readiness to Handle Advanced Care Planning Discussions

Overview
Journal Palliat Med Rep
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2021 Dec 20
PMID 34927161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emergency departments (ED) and other medical points of care are required to provide patients with advance directive (AD) information. Although many hospitals provide AD information in EDs, the comfort and preparation of the ED staff with this responsibility is unclear. To determine the attitudes, comfort levels, and prior training of ED staff with AD. The ED social workers, nurses, registration attendants, residents, and attending physicians at two academic hospitals completed a survey about their attitudes around, preparedness for, and experiences with advance care planning (ACP) discussions in the ED. We received responses from 220 ED staff. Preparedness to discuss ACP with patients varied by profession. Eighty percent of social workers ( = 4/5) and 52% ( = 16/31) of attending physicians reported preparedness to handle ACP discussions. Registration attendants were the least prepared, and only 4% ( = 1/24) reported preparedness to discuss ACP. Attempts at ACP discussions with patients also differed by profession, with attending physicians being the most likely (77%,  = 24/31), whereas registration attendants were the least likely (8%,  = 2/24). Fifty-nine percent of surveyed staff ( = 130/220) believed that ACP was a component of emergency care, although only 13% ( = 29/220) had received training. The ED staff are in favor of ACP in the ED. Preparedness for, and attempts of ACP discussions with patients in the ED vary by profession. Attending physicians and social workers tend to be the most prepared, and they report the most frequent attempts at discussions with patients. Despite the fact that registration attendants are frequently tasked with asking about patient ADs, they show little confidence in asking about and discussing such matters. Our research indicates that registration attendants feel unprepared to guide discussions of ADs and should not do so without additional training.

References
1.
Carron A, Lynn J, KEANEY P . End-of-life care in medical textbooks. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130(1):82-6. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-1-199901050-00037. View

2.
Lakin J, Isaacs E, Sullivan E, Harris H, McMahan R, Sudore R . Emergency Physicians' Experience with Advance Care Planning Documentation in the Electronic Medical Record: Useful, Needed, and Elusive. J Palliat Med. 2016; 19(6):632-8. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0486. View

3.
Larson E, Eaton T . The limits of advance directives: a history and assessment of the Patient Self-Determination Act. Wake Forest Law Rev. 1997; 32(2):249-93. View

4.
You J, Dodek P, Lamontagne F, Downar J, Sinuff T, Jiang X . What really matters in end-of-life discussions? Perspectives of patients in hospital with serious illness and their families. CMAJ. 2014; 186(18):E679-87. PMC: 4259796. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.140673. View

5.
Black K . Advance directive communication: nurses' and social workers' perceptions of roles. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006; 23(3):175-84. DOI: 10.1177/1049909106289080. View