» Articles » PMID: 34926589

LEADOR: A Method for End-To-End Participatory Design of Autonomous Social Robots

Overview
Journal Front Robot AI
Date 2021 Dec 20
PMID 34926589
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Participatory design (PD) has been used to good success in human-robot interaction (HRI) but typically remains limited to the early phases of development, with subsequent robot behaviours then being hardcoded by engineers or utilised in Wizard-of-Oz (WoZ) systems that rarely achieve autonomy. In this article, we present LEADOR (Led-by-Experts Automation and Design Of Robots), an PD methodology for domain expert co-design, automation, and evaluation of social robot behaviour. This method starts with typical PD, working with the domain expert(s) to co-design the interaction specifications and state and action space of the robot. It then replaces the traditional offline programming or WoZ phase by an and online teaching phase where the domain expert can live-program or teach the robot how to behave whilst being embedded in the interaction context. We point out that this live teaching phase can be best achieved by adding a learning component to a WoZ setup, which captures implicit knowledge of experts, as they intuitively respond to the dynamics of the situation. The robot then progressively learns an appropriate, expert-approved policy, ultimately leading to full autonomy, even in sensitive and/or ill-defined environments. However, LEADOR is agnostic to the exact technical approach used to facilitate this learning process. The extensive inclusion of the domain expert(s) in robot design represents established responsible innovation practice, lending credibility to the system both during the teaching phase and when operating autonomously. The combination of this expert inclusion with the focus on development also means that LEADOR supports a mutual shaping approach to social robotics. We draw on two previously published, foundational works from which this (generalisable) methodology has been derived to demonstrate the feasibility and worth of this approach, provide concrete examples in its application, and identify limitations and opportunities when applying this framework in new environments.

Citing Articles

Exploring cultural imaginaries of robots with children with brittle bone disease: a participatory design study.

Stimson C Med Humanit. 2025; 50(4):705-714.

PMID: 39746718 PMC: 11877108. DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013039.


From care practices to speculative vignettes-design considerations for robots in good care.

Vetter R, Dobrosovestnova A, Frijns H, Vogel L, Brunnmayr K, Frauenberger C Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1347367.

PMID: 39184865 PMC: 11341297. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1347367.


Instruments for Measuring Psychological Dimensions in Human-Robot Interaction: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.

Vagnetti R, Camp N, Story M, Ait-Belaid K, Mitra S, Zecca M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55597.

PMID: 38682783 PMC: 11187516. DOI: 10.2196/55597.


Integrating sustainability in the design process of urban service robots.

van der Schoor M, Gohlich D Front Robot AI. 2023; 10:1250697.

PMID: 37840851 PMC: 10569938. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1250697.

References
1.
Wu Y, Fassert C, Rigaud A . Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011; 54(1):121-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003. View

2.
Beer J, Smarr C, Chen T, Prakash A, Mitzner T, Kemp C . The Domesticated Robot: Design Guidelines for Assisting Older Adults to Age in Place. Proc ACM SIGCHI. 2019; 2012:335-342. PMC: 6592031. DOI: 10.1145/2157689.2157806. View

3.
Senft E, Lemaignan S, Baxter P, Bartlett M, Belpaeme T . Teaching robots social autonomy from in situ human guidance. Sci Robot. 2020; 4(35). DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat1186. View

4.
Bjorling E, Thomas K, Rose E, Cakmak M . Exploring Teens as Robot Operators, Users and Witnesses in the Wild. Front Robot AI. 2021; 7:5. PMC: 7805768. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00005. View