» Articles » PMID: 34922549

Direct Phone Communication to Primary Care Physician to Plan Discharge from Hospital: Feasibility and Benefits

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Dec 19
PMID 34922549
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The discharge summary is the main vector of communication at the time of hospital discharge, but it is known to be insufficient. Direct phone contact between hospitalist and primary care physician (PCP) at discharge could ensure rapid transmission of information, improve patient safety and promote interprofessional collaboration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of a phone call from hospitalist to PCP to plan discharge.

Methods: This study was a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional observational study. It took place in an acute medicine unit of a French university hospital. The hospitalist had to contact the PCP by telephone within 72 h prior discharge, making a maximum of 3 call attempts. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose primary care physician could be reached by telephone at the time of discharge. The other criteria were the physicians' opinions on the benefits of this contact and its effect on readmission rates.

Results: 275 patients were eligible. 8 hospitalists and 130 PCPs gave their opinion. Calls attempts were made for 71% of eligible patients. Call attempts resulted in successful contact with the PCP 157 times, representing 80% of call attempts and 57% of eligible patients. The average call completion rate was 47%. The telephone contact was perceived by hospitalist as useful and providing security. The PCPs were satisfied and wanted this intervention to become systematic. Telephone contact did not reduce the readmission rate.

Conclusions: Despite the implementation of a standardized process, the feasibility of the intervention was modest. The main obstacle was hospitalists lacking time and facing difficulties in reaching the PCPs. However, physicians showed desire to communicate directly by telephone at the time of discharge.

Trial Registration: French C.N.I.L. registration number 2108852. Registration date October 12, 2017.

Citing Articles

The complexities of communication at hospital discharge of older patients: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views.

Cam H, Wennlof B, Gillespie U, Franzon K, Nielsen E, Ling M BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1211.

PMID: 37932683 PMC: 10626684. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10192-5.


General practice care following acute exacerbations of COPD: A survey of Australian general practitioners.

Perera B, Barton C, Osadnik C PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284731.

PMID: 37098003 PMC: 10129000. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284731.


Improving the Timeliness of Discharge Summary Communication: A Quality Improvement Project.

Glover L, Wright G, Brackley S, Edwards M, Eddy L Cureus. 2023; 14(12):e32602.

PMID: 36660534 PMC: 9845513. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32602.

References
1.
Forstner J, Bossert J, Weis A, Litke N, Strassner C, Szecsenyi J . The role of personalised professional relations across care sectors in achieving high continuity of care. BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):72. PMC: 8045382. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01418-8. View

2.
Goyder C, Atherton H, Car M, Heneghan C, Car J . Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (2):CD007979. PMC: 10685995. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007979.pub3. View

3.
Car J, Sheikh A . Email consultations in health care: 1--scope and effectiveness. BMJ. 2004; 329(7463):435-8. PMC: 514208. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.435. View

4.
Kripalani S, Lefevre F, Phillips C, Williams M, Basaviah P, Baker D . Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007; 297(8):831-41. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.8.831. View

5.
Francois P, Boussat B, Fourny M, Seigneurin A . [Quality of service provided by a university hospital: general practitioners' opinion]. Sante Publique. 2014; 26(2):189-97. View