» Articles » PMID: 34921342

Register Impacts Perceptual Consonance Through Roughness and Sharpness

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2021 Dec 18
PMID 34921342
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The perception of consonance and dissonance in intervals and chords is influenced by psychoacoustic and cultural factors. Past research has provided conflicting observations about the role of frequency in assessing musical consonance that may stem from comparisons of limited frequency bands without much theorizing or modeling. Here we examine the effect of register on perceptual consonance of chords. Based on two acoustic principles, we predict a decrease in consonance at low frequencies (roughness) and a decrease of consonance at high frequencies (sharpness). Due to these two separate principles, we hypothesize that frequency will have a curvilinear impact on consonance. A selection of tetrads varying in consonance were presented in seven registers spanning 30 to 2600 Hz. Fifty-five participants rated the stimuli in an online experiment. The effect of register on consonance ratings was clear and largely according to the predictions; The low registers impacted consonance negatively and the highest two registers also received significantly lower consonance ratings than the middle registers. The impact of register on consonance could be accurately described with a cubic relationship. Overall, the influence of roughness was more pronounced on consonance ratings than sharpness. Together, these findings clarify previous empirical efforts to model the effect of frequency on consonance through basic acoustic principles. They further suggest that a credible account of consonance and dissonance in music needs to incorporate register.

Citing Articles

Timbral effects on consonance disentangle psychoacoustic mechanisms and suggest perceptual origins for musical scales.

Marjieh R, Harrison P, Lee H, Deligiannaki F, Jacoby N Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1482.

PMID: 38369535 PMC: 11258268. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45812-z.


Culture influences conscious appraisal of, but not automatic aversion to, acoustically rough musical intervals.

Armitage J, Lahdelma I, Eerola T, Ambrazevicius R PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0294645.

PMID: 38051728 PMC: 10697574. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294645.


Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.

Di Stefano N, Spence C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(7):2087-2114.

PMID: 36028614 PMC: 9481510. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02550-y.

References
1.
Keefe D, Bulen J, Arehart K, Burns E . Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 94(5):2617-38. DOI: 10.1121/1.407347. View

2.
Lahdelma I, Eerola T . Mild Dissonance Preferred Over Consonance in Single Chord Perception. Iperception. 2016; 7(3):2041669516655812. PMC: 4934671. DOI: 10.1177/2041669516655812. View

3.
Smit E, Milne A, Dean R, Weidemann G . Perception of affect in unfamiliar musical chords. PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0218570. PMC: 6588276. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218570. View

4.
McAdams S, Douglas C, Vempala N . Perception and Modeling of Affective Qualities of Musical Instrument Sounds across Pitch Registers. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:153. PMC: 5296353. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00153. View

5.
Lahdelma I, Eerola T . Cultural familiarity and musical expertise impact the pleasantness of consonance/dissonance but not its perceived tension. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):8693. PMC: 7250829. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65615-8. View