» Articles » PMID: 34921179

Great Tits Feed Their Nestlings with More but Smaller Prey Items and Fewer Caterpillars in Cities Than in Forests

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Dec 18
PMID 34921179
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapidly increasing urbanisation is one of the most significant anthropogenic environmental changes which can affect demographic traits of animal populations, for example resulting in reduced reproductive success. The food limitation hypothesis suggests that the shortage of high-quality nestling food in cities is a major factor responsible for the reduced reproductive performance in insectivorous birds. To study this explanation, we collected data on the parental provisioning behaviour of urban and forest great tits (Parus major) in three years that varied both in caterpillar availability (the main food of great tit nestlings) and in reproductive success of the birds. In all years, urban parents provisioned caterpillars in a smaller proportion to their nestlings, but the total amount of food per nestling (estimated by the volumes of all prey items) did not differ between habitats. In the two years with much lower reproductive success in urban than forest habitats, urban parents had higher provisioning rates, but provided more non-arthropod food and brought smaller prey items than forest parents. In the year with reduced habitat difference in reproductive success, urban parents were able to compensate for the scarcity of caterpillars by provisioning other arthropods rather than non-arthropod food, and by delivering larger preys than in the other years. Specifically, in this latter year, caterpillars provisioned by urban pairs were cc. twice as large as in the other two years, and were similar in size to caterpillars provisioned in the forest broods. These results show that although urban great tit parents can provide the same quantity of food per nestling as forest parents by reducing their brood size and increasing the per capita feeding rates for nestlings, they cannot compensate fully for the scarcity of high-quality preys (caterpillars) in poor years. In some years, however, favourable conditions for urban caterpillar development can greatly reduce food limitation in cities, allowing urban birds to achieve higher reproductive success. We suggest that urban green areas designed and managed in a way to facilitate conditions for phytophagous arthropods could improve habitat quality for urban birds.

Citing Articles

Radio-tracking urban breeding birds: The importance of native vegetation.

Seress G, Sandor K, Bokony V, Bukor B, Hubai K, Liker A Ecol Appl. 2025; 35(1):e3095.

PMID: 39844423 PMC: 11754724. DOI: 10.1002/eap.3095.


The impact of urbanization on health depends on the health metric, life stage and level of urbanization: a global meta-analysis on avian species.

Reid R, Capilla-Lasheras P, Haddou Y, Boonekamp J, Dominoni D Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2027):20240617.

PMID: 39016598 PMC: 11253839. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0617.


Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex.

Rubene D, Low M, Brodin A R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(2):221336.

PMID: 36778952 PMC: 9905992. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.221336.


Breeding in the pandemic: short-term lockdown restrictions in a European capital city did not alter the life-history traits of two urban adapters.

Corsini M, Jagiello Z, Walesiak M, Redlisiak M, Stadnicki I, Mierzejewska E Urban Ecosyst. 2022; :1-11.

PMID: 36532698 PMC: 9748896. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-022-01309-5.

References
1.
Pollock C, Capilla-Lasheras P, McGill R, Helm B, Dominoni D . Integrated behavioural and stable isotope data reveal altered diet linked to low breeding success in urban-dwelling blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):5014. PMC: 5503996. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04575-y. View

2.
Jarrett C, Powell L, McDevitt H, Helm B, Welch A . Bitter fruits of hard labour: diet metabarcoding and telemetry reveal that urban songbirds travel further for lower-quality food. Oecologia. 2020; 193(2):377-388. PMC: 7320956. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04678-w. View

3.
Seress G, Hammer T, Bokony V, Vincze E, Preiszner B, Pipoly I . Impact of urbanization on abundance and phenology of caterpillars and consequences for breeding in an insectivorous bird. Ecol Appl. 2018; 28(5):1143-1156. DOI: 10.1002/eap.1730. View

4.
Baldan D, Ouyang J . Urban resources limit pair coordination over offspring provisioning. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):15888. PMC: 7522258. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72951-2. View

5.
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P . Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 2008; 50(3):346-63. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200810425. View