» Articles » PMID: 34921117

Leveraging Nonstructural Data to Predict Structures and Affinities of Protein-ligand Complexes

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Dec 18
PMID 34921117
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past five decades, tremendous effort has been devoted to computational methods for predicting properties of ligands-i.e., molecules that bind macromolecular targets. Such methods, which are critical to rational drug design, fall into two categories: physics-based methods, which directly model ligand interactions with the target given the target's three-dimensional (3D) structure, and ligand-based methods, which predict ligand properties given experimental measurements for similar ligands. Here, we present a rigorous statistical framework to combine these two sources of information. We develop a method to predict a ligand's pose-the 3D structure of the ligand bound to its target-that leverages a widely available source of information: a list of other ligands that are known to bind the same target but for which no 3D structure is available. This combination of physics-based and ligand-based modeling improves pose prediction accuracy across all major families of drug targets. Using the same framework, we develop a method for virtual screening of drug candidates, which outperforms standard physics-based and ligand-based virtual screening methods. Our results suggest broad opportunities to improve prediction of various ligand properties by combining diverse sources of information through customized machine-learning approaches.

Citing Articles

Reducing overconfident errors in molecular property classification using Posterior Network.

Fan Z, Yu J, Zhang X, Chen Y, Sun S, Zhang Y Patterns (N Y). 2024; 5(6):100991.

PMID: 39005492 PMC: 11240180. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100991.


Predictive Models and Impact of Interfacial Contacts and Amino Acids on Protein-Protein Binding Affinity.

Yi C, Taylor M, Ziebarth J, Wang Y ACS Omega. 2024; 9(3):3454-3468.

PMID: 38284090 PMC: 10809705. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c06996.


CarsiDock: a deep learning paradigm for accurate protein-ligand docking and screening based on large-scale pre-training.

Cai H, Shen C, Jian T, Zhang X, Chen T, Han X Chem Sci. 2024; 15(4):1449-1471.

PMID: 38274053 PMC: 10806797. DOI: 10.1039/d3sc05552c.


How accurately can one predict drug binding modes using AlphaFold models?.

Karelina M, Noh J, Dror R Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38131311 PMC: 10746139. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89386.


Enhancing Ligand Pose Sampling for Molecular Docking.

Suriana P, Dror R ArXiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38076510 PMC: 10705564.


References
1.
Eismann S, Townshend R, Thomas N, Jagota M, Jing B, Dror R . Hierarchical, rotation-equivariant neural networks to select structural models of protein complexes. Proteins. 2020; 89(5):493-501. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26033. View

2.
Ferreira L, Dos Santos R, Oliva G, Andricopulo A . Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies. Molecules. 2015; 20(7):13384-421. PMC: 6332083. DOI: 10.3390/molecules200713384. View

3.
Papadatos G, Gaulton A, Hersey A, Overington J . Activity, assay and target data curation and quality in the ChEMBL database. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015; 29(9):885-96. PMC: 4607714. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-015-9860-5. View

4.
Ravindranath P, Forli S, Goodsell D, Olson A, Sanner M . AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(12):e1004586. PMC: 4667975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004586. View

5.
Ramsundar B, Liu B, Wu Z, Verras A, Tudor M, Sheridan R . Is Multitask Deep Learning Practical for Pharma?. J Chem Inf Model. 2017; 57(8):2068-2076. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00146. View