» Articles » PMID: 34920690

Subsidence of Interbody Cage Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: An Analysis and Potential Risk Factors

Overview
Journal Global Spine J
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2021 Dec 18
PMID 34920690
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: This study aimed to report the incidence and potential risk factors of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence following oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases. We proposed also an algorithm to minimize subsidence following OLIF surgery.

Methods: The study included a retrospective cohort of 107 consecutive patients (48 men and 59 women; mean age, 67.4 years) who had received either single- or multi-level OLIF between 2012 and 2019. Patients were classified into subsidence and non-subsidence groups. PEEK cage subsidence was defined as any violation of either endplate from the computed tomography scan in both sagittal and coronal views. Preoperative variables such as age, sex, body mass index, bone mineral density (BMD) measured by preoperative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, smoking status, corticosteroid use, diagnosis, operative level, multifidus muscle cross-sectional area, and multifidus muscle fatty degeneration were collected. Age-related variables (height and length) were also documented. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the risk factors of subsidence.

Results: Of the 107 patients (137 levels), 50 (46.7%) met the subsidence criteria. Higher PEEK cage height had the strongest association with subsidence (OR = 9.59, < .001). Other factors significantly associated with cage subsistence included age >60 years (OR = 3.15, = .018), BMD <-2.5 (OR = 2.78, = .006), and severe multifidus muscle fatty degeneration (OR = 1.97, = .023).

Conclusions: Risk factors for subsidence in OLIF were age >60 years, BMD < -2.5, higher cage height, and severe multifidus muscle fatty degeneration. Patients who had subsidence had worse early (3 months) postoperative back and leg pain.

Citing Articles

Is lumbar spondylolisthesis a risk factor of cage subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral screw fixation?.

Peng X, Wang X, Xie T, Hu X, Zeng J J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):230.

PMID: 40033419 PMC: 11877892. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05624-3.


The risk factors for low back pain following oblique lateral interbody fusion: focus on sarcopenia.

Miao D, Fan M, Zhang W, Ma X, Wang H, Gao X J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):171.

PMID: 39962600 PMC: 11834252. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05584-8.


3D-printed porous titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of subsidence.

Liu S, Zeng T, Chen C, He L, Feng A, Jhang S Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11:1389533.

PMID: 39744537 PMC: 11688201. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1389533.


Two-stage surgery with oblique lateral interbody fusion and posterior fixation in degenerative scoliosis with lumbosacral curve-driven degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a feasible option to prevent postoperative coronal decompensation.

Fan Z, Huang Q, Zhu W, Wang W, Li X, Wang Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):880.

PMID: 39726024 PMC: 11670490. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05368-6.


The effects of cage on endplate collapse after stand-alone OLIF: based on finite element analysis and mechanics experiments.

Li H, Liu J, Cui H, Shen N, Wu F, Zhang Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1508385.

PMID: 39723127 PMC: 11669059. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1508385.


References
1.
Campbell P, Cavanaugh D, Nunley P, Utter P, Kerr E, Wadhwa R . PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence. Neurosurg Focus. 2020; 49(3):E10. DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20367. View

2.
Kepler C, Sharma A, Huang R, Meredith D, Girardi F, Cammisa Jr F . Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 16(4):329-33. DOI: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11528. View

3.
Frisch R, Luna I, Brooks D, Joshua G, OBrien J . Clinical and radiographic analysis of expandable versus static lateral lumbar interbody fusion devices with two-year follow-up. J Spine Surg. 2018; 4(1):62-71. PMC: 5911767. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.03.16. View

4.
Le T, Baaj A, Dakwar E, Burkett C, Murray G, Smith D . Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(14):1268-73. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458b2f. View

5.
Palepu V, Helgeson M, Molyneaux-Francis M, Nagaraja S . The Effects of Bone Microstructure on Subsidence Risk for ALIF, LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF Spine Cages. J Biomech Eng. 2018; 141(3). DOI: 10.1115/1.4042181. View