» Articles » PMID: 34916416

Neuronal Reprogramming in Treating Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Date 2021 Dec 17
PMID 34916416
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spinal cord injury represents a devastating central nervous system injury that could impair the mobility and sensory function of afflicted patients. The hallmarks of spinal cord injury include neuroinflammation, axonal degeneration, neuronal loss, and reactive gliosis. Furthermore, the formation of a glial scar at the injury site elicits an inhibitory environment for potential neuroregeneration. Besides axonal regeneration, a significant challenge in treating spinal cord injury is to replenish the neurons lost during the pathological process. However, despite decades of research efforts, current strategies including stem cell transplantation have not resulted in a successful clinical therapy. Furthermore, stem cell transplantation faces serious hurdles such as immunorejection of the transplanted cells and ethical issues. In vivo neuronal reprogramming is a recently developed technology and leading a major breakthrough in regenerative medicine. This innovative technology converts endogenous glial cells into functional neurons for injury repair in the central nervous system. The feasibility of in vivo neuronal reprogramming has been demonstrated successfully in models of different neurological disorders including spinal cord injury by numerous laboratories. Several reprogramming factors, mainly the pro-neural transcription factors, have been utilized to reprogram endogenous glial cells into functional neurons with distinct phenotypes. So far, the literature on in vivo neuronal reprogramming in the model of spinal cord injury is still small. In this review, we summarize a limited number of such reports and discuss several questions that we think are important for applying in vivo neuronal reprogramming in the research field of spinal cord injury as well as other central nervous system disorders.

Citing Articles

neuronal regeneration: the potential of astrocytes.

Tan R, Haseloff R, Mo Y, Zhang J Life Med. 2025; 2(5):lnad036.

PMID: 39872896 PMC: 11749267. DOI: 10.1093/lifemedi/lnad036.


Reprogramming stem cells in regenerative medicine.

Mao J, Saiding Q, Qian S, Liu Z, Zhao B, Zhao Q Smart Med. 2024; 1(1):e20220005.

PMID: 39188749 PMC: 11235200. DOI: 10.1002/SMMD.20220005.


Fucoidan improving spinal cord injury recovery: Modulating microenvironment and promoting remyelination.

Shu H, Zhang X, Pu Y, Zhang Y, Huang S, Ma J CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024; 30(8):e14903.

PMID: 39139089 PMC: 11322593. DOI: 10.1111/cns.14903.


Controlling the Expression Level of the Neuronal Reprogramming Factors for a Successful Reprogramming Outcome.

Mseis-Jackson N, Sharma M, Li H Cells. 2024; 13(14.

PMID: 39056804 PMC: 11274869. DOI: 10.3390/cells13141223.


Spinal Cord Injury Management Based on Microglia-Targeting Therapies.

Schreiner T, Schreiner O, Ciobanu R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792314 PMC: 11122315. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102773.


References
1.
Hong P, Jiang M, Li H . Functional requirement of dicer1 and miR-17-5p in reactive astrocyte proliferation after spinal cord injury in the mouse. Glia. 2014; 62(12):2044-60. DOI: 10.1002/glia.22725. View

2.
Nori S, Ahuja C, Fehlings M . Translational Advances in the Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: What is New? What is Hot?. Neurosurgery. 2017; 64(CN_suppl_1):119-128. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx217. View

3.
Alvarez-Garcia I, Miska E . MicroRNA functions in animal development and human disease. Development. 2005; 132(21):4653-62. DOI: 10.1242/dev.02073. View

4.
Burda J, Sofroniew M . Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron. 2014; 81(2):229-48. PMC: 3984950. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.034. View

5.
Lu P, Woodruff G, Wang Y, Graham L, Hunt M, Wu D . Long-distance axonal growth from human induced pluripotent stem cells after spinal cord injury. Neuron. 2014; 83(4):789-96. PMC: 4144679. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.014. View