» Articles » PMID: 34914737

Offspring of First-generation Hatchery Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Grow Faster in the Hatchery Than Offspring of Wild Fish, but Survive Worse in the Wild: Possible Mechanisms for Inadvertent Domestication and Fitness Loss in Hatchery Salmon

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Dec 16
PMID 34914737
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Salmonid fish raised in hatcheries often have lower fitness (number of returning adult offspring) than wild fish when both spawn in the wild. Body size at release from hatcheries is positively correlated with survival at sea. So one explanation for reduced fitness is that hatcheries inadvertently select for trait values that enhance growth rate under the unnatural environment of a hatchery, but that are maladaptive in the wild environment. A simple prediction of this hypothesis is that juveniles of hatchery origin should grow more quickly than fish of wild origin under hatchery conditions, but should have lower survival under wild conditions. We tested that hypothesis using multiple full sibling families of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that were spawned using either two wild parents (WxW) or two first-generation hatchery (HxH) parents. Offspring from all the families were grown together under hatchery conditions and under semi-natural conditions in artificial streams. HxH families grew significantly faster in the hatchery, but had significantly lower survival in the streams. That we see this tradeoff after only a single generation of selection suggests that the traits involved are under very strong selection. We also considered one possible alteration to the hatchery environment that might reduce the intensity of selection among families in size at release. Here we tested whether reducing the fat content of hatchery feed would reduce the variance among families in body size. Although fish raised under a low-fat diet were slightly smaller, the variation among families in final size was unchanged. Thus, there is no evidence that reducing the fat content of hatchery feed would reduce the opportunity for selection among families on size at release.

Citing Articles

Salmon hatchery strays can demographically boost wild populations at the cost of diversity: quantitative genetic modelling of Alaska pink salmon.

May S, Shedd K, Gruenthal K, Hard J, Templin W, Waters C R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(7):240455.

PMID: 39076353 PMC: 11286167. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240455.


Selection among critically endangered landlocked salmon ( m. ) families in survival and growth traits across early life stages and in different environments.

Janhunen M, Eronen A, Kekalainen J, Primmer C, Donner I, Hyvarinen P Evol Appl. 2024; 17(4):e13692.

PMID: 38681511 PMC: 11052761. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13692.


Demographic patterns of walleye () reproductive success in a Wisconsin population.

Davis R, Simmons L, Shaw S, Sass G, Sard N, Isermann D Evol Appl. 2024; 17(3):e13665.

PMID: 38468712 PMC: 10925830. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13665.


Genomic evidence for domestication selection in three hatchery populations of Chinook salmon, .

Howe N, Hale M, Waters C, Schaal S, Shedd K, Larson W Evol Appl. 2024; 17(2):e13656.

PMID: 38357359 PMC: 10866082. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13656.


Loss of plasticity in maturation timing after ten years of captive spawning in a delta smelt conservation hatchery.

LaCava M, Griffiths J, Ellison L, Carson E, Hung T, Finger A Evol Appl. 2023; 16(11):1845-1857.

PMID: 38029063 PMC: 10681455. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13611.


References
1.
Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin M . Carry-over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild-born descendants in the wild. Biol Lett. 2009; 5(5):621-4. PMC: 2781957. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0315. View

2.
Araki H, Ardren W, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin M . Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood river. Conserv Biol. 2007; 21(1):181-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00564.x. View

3.
Christie M, Ford M, Blouin M . On the reproductive success of early-generation hatchery fish in the wild. Evol Appl. 2014; 7(8):883-96. PMC: 4211718. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12183. View

4.
Janowitz-Koch I, Rabe C, Kinzer R, Nelson D, Hess M, Narum S . Long-term evaluation of fitness and demographic effects of a Chinook Salmon supplementation program. Evol Appl. 2019; 12(3):456-469. PMC: 6383734. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12725. View

5.
Araki H, Berejikian B, Ford M, Blouin M . Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild. Evol Appl. 2015; 1(2):342-55. PMC: 3352433. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00026.x. View