» Articles » PMID: 34909768

Transcriptional Pathology Evolves over Time in Rat Hippocampus After Lateral Fluid Percussion Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview
Journal Neurotrauma Rep
Date 2021 Dec 15
PMID 34909768
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes acute and lasting impacts on the brain, driving pathology along anatomical, cellular, and behavioral dimensions. Rodent models offer an opportunity to study the temporal progression of disease from injury to recovery. Transcriptomic and epigenomic analysis were applied to evaluate gene expression in ipsilateral hippocampus at 1 and 14 days after sham ( = 2 and 4, respectively per time point) and moderate lateral fluid percussion injury ( = 4 per time point). This enabled the identification of dynamic changes and differential gene expression (differentially expressed genes; DEGs) modules linked to underlying epigenetic response. We observed acute signatures associated with cell death, astrocytosis, and neurotransmission that largely recovered by 2 weeks. Inflammation and immune signatures segregated into upregulated modules with distinct expression trajectories and functions. Whereas most down-regulated genes recovered by 14 days, two modules with delayed and persistent changes were associated with cholesterol metabolism, amyloid beta clearance, and neurodegeneration. Differential expression was paralleled by changes in histone H3 lysine residue 4 trimethylation at the promoters of DEGs at 1 day post-TBI, with the strongest changes observed for inflammation and immune response genes. These results demonstrate how integrated genomics analysis in the pre-clinical setting has the potential to identify stage-specific biomarkers for injury and/or recovery. Though limited in scope here, our general strategy has the potential to capture pathological signatures over time and evaluate treatment efficacy at the systems level.

Citing Articles

Propofol Suppresses Ferroptosis via Modulating eNOS/NO Signaling Pathway to Improve Traumatic Brain Injury.

Zheng Z, Wang X, Hu Y, Li W, Zhou Q, Xu F Brain Behav. 2024; 14(12):e70187.

PMID: 39726103 PMC: 11671348. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70187.


The Rehabilitation Potential of Neurostimulation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Animal and Human Studies.

McNerney M, Gurkoff G, Beard C, Berryhill M Brain Sci. 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37891771 PMC: 10605899. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101402.


Fundamental Neurochemistry Review: Microglial immunometabolism in traumatic brain injury.

Strogulski N, Portela L, Polster B, Loane D J Neurochem. 2023; 167(2):129-153.

PMID: 37759406 PMC: 10655864. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15959.

References
1.
Luo J, Yang H, Song B . Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019; 21(4):225-245. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7. View

2.
Wong V, Langley B . Epigenetic changes following traumatic brain injury and their implications for outcome, recovery and therapy. Neurosci Lett. 2016; 625:26-33. PMC: 4915732. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.04.009. View

3.
Xicoy H, Wieringa B, Martens G . The Role of Lipids in Parkinson's Disease. Cells. 2019; 8(1). PMC: 6356353. DOI: 10.3390/cells8010027. View

4.
Ritchie M, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law C, Shi W . limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(7):e47. PMC: 4402510. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. View

5.
Kawano H, Kimura-Kuroda J, Komuta Y, Yoshioka N, Li H, Kawamura K . Role of the lesion scar in the response to damage and repair of the central nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2012; 349(1):169-80. PMC: 3375417. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-012-1336-5. View