» Articles » PMID: 34905132

Implementation of Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Neoplasms: Results from a Single Centre

Overview
Date 2021 Dec 14
PMID 34905132
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Local excisions are important in a tailored approach to treatment of rectal neoplasms. In cases of low risk T1 local excision facilitates rectal-preserving treatment. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is the most recent alternative developed for local excision. In this study we evaluate the results after implementing TAMIS as the routine procedure for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

Methods: All patients who underwent TAMIS from January 2016 to January 2020 at St. Olav's University Hospital were included, and clinical, pathological and oncological data were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint was local recurrence, and the secondary endpoint was complications.

Results: There were 76 patients (42 men, mean age was 69 years [range 26-88 years]), The mean tumour level was 82 mm (range 20-140 mm) from the anal verge measured on rigid proctoscopy, and mean tumour size was 32 mm (range 8-73 mm). Three patients experienced complications needing intervention (Clavien-Dindo > 3A). Seventeen patients had rectal adenocarcinoma, 9 of whom underwent R0 completion total mesorectal excision (cTME). Fifty-five patients had an adenoma, 3 of whom developed recurrence (5.4%) within 12 months. All recurrences were treated successfully with a new TAMIS procedure. In addition, TAMIS was used in treatment of 2 patients with a neuroendocrine tumour, 1 patient with a haemangioma and 1 patient with a solitary rectal ulcer.

Conclusions: TAMIS surgery is associated with a low risk of complications and a low recurrence rate in rectal neoplasms. In cases of adenocarcinoma, R0 cTME surgery is feasible in the sub-group with high risk T1 and T2 tumours.

Citing Articles

Transanal repair of anastomotic leakage after oncologic low anterior resection: a prospective cohort.

Lossius W, Stornes T, Bernstein T, Wibe A Tech Coloproctol. 2025; 29(1):67.

PMID: 39951169 PMC: 11828829. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03103-1.

References
1.
Jones H, Cunningham C, Nicholson G, Hompes R . Outcomes following completion and salvage surgery for early rectal cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 44(1):15-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.10.212. View

2.
Garcia-Aguilar J, Renfro L, Chow O, Shi Q, Carrero X, Lynn P . Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(15):1537-1546. PMC: 4984260. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00215-6. View

3.
Keane C, Young M . Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2014; 84(10):758-62. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12409. View

4.
Caycedo-Marulanda A, Jiang H, Kohtakangas E . Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign large rectal polyps and early malignant rectal cancers: experience and outcomes from the first Canadian centre to adopt the technique. Can J Surg. 2017; 60(6):416-423. PMC: 5726971. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.002417. View

5.
Quaresima S, Balla A, Franceschilli L, La Torre M, Iafrate C, Shalaby M . Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Lesions. JSLS. 2016; 20(3). PMC: 4978546. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00032. View