» Articles » PMID: 34902893

Ultrasonographic Ovarian Mass Scoring System for Predicting Malignancy in Pregnant Women with Ovarian Mass

Overview
Date 2021 Dec 13
PMID 34902893
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During routine antenatal ultrasound examinations, an ovarian mass can be found incidentally. In clinical practice, the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian masses is essential for planning further management. Ultrasound imaging has become the most popular diagnostic tool during pregnancy, with the recent development of ultrasonography. In non-pregnant women, several methods have been used to predict malignant ovarian masses before surgery. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group reported several scoring systems, such as the IOTA simple rules, IOTA logistic regression models, and IOTA assessment of different NEoplasias in the adneXa. Other researchers have also evaluated the malignancy of ovarian masses before surgery using scoring systems such as the Sassone score, pelvic mass score, DePriest score, Lerner score, and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System. These researchers suggested specific features of ovarian masses that can be used for differential diagnosis, including size, proportion of solid tissue, papillary projections, inner wall structure, locules, wall thickness, septa, echogenicity, acoustic shadows, and presence of ascites. Although these factors can also be measured in pregnant women using ultrasound, only a few studies have applied ovarian scoring systems in pregnant women. In this article, we reviewed various scoring systems for predicting malignant tumors of the ovary and determined whether they can be applied to pregnant women.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis: Simple Rules for diagnosing ovarian tumors-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gareeballah A, Gameraddin M, Alshoabi S, Alsaedi A, Elzaki M, Alsharif W Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1474930.

PMID: 39902128 PMC: 11788135. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1474930.


Struma Ovarii during Pregnancy.

Dumachita-Sargu G, Socolov R, Balan T, Gafitanu D, Akad M, Balan R Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893698 PMC: 11172045. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111172.


Validity of ultrasound with color Doppler to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian tumours.

Mahale N, Kumar N, Mahale A, Ullal S, Fernandes M, Prabhu S Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024; 67(2):227-234.

PMID: 38374696 PMC: 10948212. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.23072.


Prediction of the Risk of Malignancy of Adnexal Masses during Pregnancy Comparing Subjective Assessment and Non-Contrast MRI Score (NCMS) in Radiologists with Different Expertise.

Panico C, Bottazzi S, Russo L, Avesani G, Celli V, DErme L Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(21).

PMID: 37958313 PMC: 10648807. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215138.


Diagnostic imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy.

Kim J, Lim J, Sohn J, Lee S, Lee M Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023; 66(3):133-148.

PMID: 36907575 PMC: 10191762. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.22287.


References
1.
Hogston P, Lilford R . Ultrasound study of ovarian cysts in pregnancy: prevalence and significance. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986; 93(6):625-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb08037.x. View

2.
Zanetta G, Mariani E, Lissoni A, Ceruti P, Trio D, Strobelt N . A prospective study of the role of ultrasound in the management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. BJOG. 2003; 110(6):578-83. View

3.
Balci O, Gezginc K, Karatayli R, Acar A, Celik C, Colakoglu M . Management and outcomes of adnexal masses during pregnancy: a 6-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008; 34(4):524-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00744.x. View

4.
Usui R, Minakami H, Kosuge S, Iwasaki R, Ohwada M, Sato I . A retrospective survey of clinical, pathologic, and prognostic features of adnexal masses operated on during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2000; 26(2):89-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2000.tb01289.x. View

5.
Lerner J, Timor-Tritsch I, Federman A, Abramovich G . Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170(1 Pt 1):81-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70388-4. View