» Articles » PMID: 34900172

Understanding the Role of Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase and Stromal Differentiation in Rare Subtype Endometrial Cancer

Overview
Journal Rare Tumors
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Dec 13
PMID 34900172
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a disease with good and poor prognostic subtypes. Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DEC), undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC), and clear cell endometrial carcinoma (CEC) are rare high-grade tumors, associated with a poor prognosis and high pathologic stage. Many studies have been performed on the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis mainly focus on endometrioid adenocarcinomas and little research has been done on rare subtypes. The present body of work aims to evaluate the role of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO-1) and stromal differentiation (SD), their correlation with clinicopathologic features and overall survival. Here we found that positive IDO-1 expression in immune cells correlated with worse disease-free survival ( = 0.02), recurrence ( = 0.03), high pathologic tumor stage ( = 0.024), lymph node metastasis ( = 0.028), and myometrial invasion ( = 0.03). Our findings suggest IDO-1 to be relevant in both MMR intact and deficient tumors; however, >20% immune cell staining was restricted to MMR deficient cancers. For the stroma, immature, myxoid differentiation was found to correlate with worse disease-free survival ( = 0.04). We also found the correlation between IDO-1 expression and immature stroma. Looking forward, IDO-1 could be promising for immunotherapy and SD could be the answer to clinical heterogeneity.

Citing Articles

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma diagnosed during perimenopausal hormone therapy: a case report and literature review.

Wang Y, Zheng Y, Zhang L, Cao X, Lin Z, Liu H Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1440246.

PMID: 39650060 PMC: 11620970. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1440246.


Prognostic role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 expression in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang H, Li J, Zhou Q Front Oncol. 2022; 12:954495.

PMID: 36212460 PMC: 9538899. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.954495.

References
1.
Espinosa I, Catasus L, D Angelo E, Mozos A, Pedrola N, Bertolo C . Stromal signatures in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2013; 27(4):631-9. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.131. View

2.
Byun J, Gardner K . Wounds that will not heal: pervasive cellular reprogramming in cancer. Am J Pathol. 2013; 182(4):1055-64. PMC: 3657619. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.01.009. View

3.
WILSON T, Podratz K, Gaffey T, MALKASIAN Jr G, OBrien P, Naessens J . Evaluation of unfavorable histologic subtypes in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 162(2):418-23; discussion 423-6. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90399-r. View

4.
Silva E, Deavers M, Malpica A . Undifferentiated carcinoma of the endometrium: a review. Pathology. 2007; 39(1):134-8. DOI: 10.1080/00313020601159494. View

5.
Ha S, Yeo S, Xuan Y, Kim S . The prognostic significance of cancer-associated fibroblasts in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99955. PMC: 4063790. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099955. View