» Articles » PMID: 34880296

Decoding Accelerometry for Classification and Prediction of Critically Ill Patients with Severe Brain Injury

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Dec 9
PMID 34880296
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our goal is to explore quantitative motor features in critically ill patients with severe brain injury (SBI). We hypothesized that computational decoding of these features would yield information on underlying neurological states and outcomes. Using wearable microsensors placed on all extremities, we recorded a median 24.1 (IQR: 22.8-25.1) hours of high-frequency accelerometry data per patient from a prospective cohort (n = 69) admitted to the ICU with SBI. Models were trained using time-, frequency-, and wavelet-domain features and levels of responsiveness and outcome as labels. The two primary tasks were detection of levels of responsiveness, assessed by motor sub-score of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCSm), and prediction of functional outcome at discharge, measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Detection models achieved significant (AUC: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.53-0.85]) and consistent (observation windows: 12 min-9 h) discrimination of SBI patients capable of purposeful movement (GCSm > 4). Prediction models accurately discriminated patients of upper moderate disability or better (GOSE > 5) with 2-6 h of observation (AUC: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.75-0.90]). Results suggest that time series analysis of motor activity yields clinically relevant insights on underlying functional states and short-term outcomes in patients with SBI.

Citing Articles

TILTomorrow today: dynamic factors predicting changes in intracranial pressure treatment intensity after traumatic brain injury.

Bhattacharyay S, van Leeuwen F, Beqiri E, Akerlund C, Wilson L, Steyerberg E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):95.

PMID: 39747195 PMC: 11696189. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83862-x.


Accelerometer-derived movement features as predictive biomarkers for muscle atrophy in neurocritical care: a prospective cohort study.

Schmidbauer M, Putz T, Gehri L, Ratkovic L, Maskos A, Zibold J Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):288.

PMID: 39217360 PMC: 11366141. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05067-y.


Emerging methods for measuring physical activity using accelerometry in children and adolescents with neuromotor disorders: a narrative review.

Petersen B, Erickson K, Kurowski B, Boninger M, Treble-Barna A J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):31.

PMID: 38419099 PMC: 10903036. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01327-8.


Mining the contribution of intensive care clinical course to outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Bhattacharyay S, Caruso P, Akerlund C, Wilson L, Stevens R, Menon D NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):154.

PMID: 37604980 PMC: 10442346. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00895-8.


Classification of Level of Consciousness in a Neurological ICU Using Physiological Data.

Gomez L, Shen Q, Doyle K, Vrosgou A, Velazquez A, Megjhani M Neurocrit Care. 2022; 38(1):118-128.

PMID: 36109448 PMC: 9935697. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01586-0.


References
1.
Reith F, Brennan P, Maas A, Teasdale G . Lack of Standardization in the Use of the Glasgow Coma Scale: Results of International Surveys. J Neurotrauma. 2015; 33(1):89-94. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3843. View

2.
Hansson G, Asterland P, Holmer N, Skerfving S . Validity and reliability of triaxial accelerometers for inclinometry in posture analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2001; 39(4):405-13. DOI: 10.1007/BF02345361. View

3.
Olkowski B, Shah S . Early Mobilization in the Neuro-ICU: How Far Can We Go?. Neurocrit Care. 2016; 27(1):141-150. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-016-0338-7. View

4.
Shadmehr R, Krakauer J . A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 185(3):359-81. PMC: 2553854. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5. View

5.
Tsamardinos I, Greasidou E, Borboudakis G . Bootstrapping the out-of-sample predictions for efficient and accurate cross-validation. Mach Learn. 2018; 107(12):1895-1922. PMC: 6191021. DOI: 10.1007/s10994-018-5714-4. View