» Articles » PMID: 34880007

Testing a Newly Developed Activity Pacing Framework for Chronic Pain/fatigue: a Feasibility Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Dec 9
PMID 34880007
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To test the feasibility of using a new activity pacing framework to standardise healthcare professionals' instructions of pacing, and explore whether measures of activity pacing/symptoms detected changes following treatment.

Design: Single-arm, repeated measures study.

Setting: One National Health Service (NHS) Pain Service in Northern England, UK.

Participants: Adult patients with chronic pain/fatigue, including chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis.

Interventions: Six-week rehabilitation programme, standardised using the activity pacing framework.

Outcome Measures: Feasibility was explored via patients' recruitment/attrition rates, adherence and satisfaction, and healthcare professionals' fidelity. Questionnaire data were collected from patients at the start and end of the programme (T1 and T2, respectively) and 3 months' follow-up (T3). Questionnaires included measures of activity pacing, current/usual pain, physical/mental fatigue, depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, avoidance, physical/mental function and quality of life. Mean changes in activity pacing and symptoms between T1-T2, T2-T3 and T1-T3 were estimated.

Results: Of the 139 eligible patients, 107 patients consented (recruitment rate=77%); 65 patients completed T2 (T1-T2 attrition rate=39%), and 52 patients completed T3 (T1-T3 attrition rate=51%). At T2, patients' satisfaction ratings averaged 9/10, and 89% attended ≥5 rehabilitation programme sessions. Activity pacing and all symptoms improved between T1 and T2, with smaller improvements maintained at T3.

Conclusion: The activity pacing framework was feasible to implement and patients' ability to pace and manage their symptoms improved. Future work will employ a suitable comparison group and test the framework across wider settings to explore the effects of activity pacing in a randomised controlled trial.

Trial Registration Number: NCT03497585.

Citing Articles

Health-related quality of life associated with fatigue, physical activity and activity pacing in adults with chronic conditions.

Barakou I, Seves B, Abonie U, Finch T, Hackett K, Hettinga F BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025; 17(1):13.

PMID: 39875970 PMC: 11773964. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-025-01057-x.


A Personalised Pacing and Active Rest Rehabilitation Programme for Post-Exertional Symptom Exacerbation and Health Status in Long COVID (PACELOC): A Prospective Cohort Study.

Godfrey B, Shardha J, Witton S, Bodey R, Tarrant R, Greenwood D J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797180 PMC: 11722468. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010097.


Self-regulation of effort for a better health-related quality of life: a multidimensional activity pacing model for chronic pain and fatigue management.

Barakou I, Hackett K, Finch T, Hettinga F Ann Med. 2023; 55(2):2270688.

PMID: 37871249 PMC: 10595396. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2270688.


A scoping review of 'Pacing' for management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): lessons learned for the long COVID pandemic.

Sanal-Hayes N, Mclaughlin M, Hayes L, Mair J, Ormerod J, Carless D J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):720.

PMID: 37838675 PMC: 10576275. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04587-5.

References
1.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

2.
Meeus M, Nijs J, De Meirleir K . Chronic musculoskeletal pain in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2006; 11(4):377-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.06.005. View

3.
Andrews N, Deen M . Defining Activity Pacing: Is It Time to Jump Off the Merry-Go-Round?. J Pain. 2016; 17(12):1359-1362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.05.001. View

4.
Nijs J, Meeus M, Van Oosterwijck J, Ickmans K, Moorkens G, Hans G . In the mind or in the brain? Scientific evidence for central sensitisation in chronic fatigue syndrome. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011; 42(2):203-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02575.x. View

5.
Arendt-Nielsen L, Morlion B, Perrot S, Dahan A, Dickenson A, Kress H . Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions. Eur J Pain. 2017; 22(2):216-241. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1140. View