» Articles » PMID: 34876110

Modelling and Identification of Characteristic Kinematic Features Preceding Freezing of Gait with Convolutional Neural Networks and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Dec 8
PMID 34876110
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although deep neural networks (DNNs) are showing state of the art performance in clinical gait analysis, they are considered to be black-box algorithms. In other words, there is a lack of direct understanding of a DNN's ability to identify relevant features, hindering clinical acceptance. Interpretability methods have been developed to ameliorate this concern by providing a way to explain DNN predictions.

Methods: This paper proposes the use of an interpretability method to explain DNN decisions for classifying the movement that precedes freezing of gait (FOG), one of the most debilitating symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). The proposed two-stage pipeline consists of (1) a convolutional neural network (CNN) to model the reduction of movement present before a FOG episode, and (2) layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) to visualize the underlying features that the CNN perceives as important to model the pathology. The CNN was trained with the sagittal plane kinematics from a motion capture dataset of fourteen PD patients with FOG. The robustness of the model predictions and learned features was further assessed on fourteen PD patients without FOG and fourteen age-matched healthy controls.

Results: The CNN proved highly accurate in modelling the movement that precedes FOG, with 86.8% of the strides being correctly identified. However, the CNN model was unable to model the movement for one of the seven patients that froze during the protocol. The LRP interpretability case study shows that (1) the kinematic features perceived as most relevant by the CNN are the reduced peak knee flexion and the fixed ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase, (2) very little relevance for FOG is observed in the PD patients without FOG and the healthy control subjects, and (3) the poor predictive performance of one subject is attributed to the patient's unique and severely flexed gait signature.

Conclusions: The proposed pipeline can aid clinicians in explaining DNN decisions in clinical gait analysis and aid machine learning practitioners in assessing the generalization of their models by ensuring that the predictions are based on meaningful kinematic features.

Citing Articles

Explainable Machine Learning Models for Brain Diseases: Insights from a Systematic Review.

Rodriguez Mallma M, Zuloaga-Rotta L, Borja-Rosales R, Rodriguez Mallma J, Vilca-Aguilar M, Salas-Ojeda M Neurol Int. 2024; 16(6):1285-1307.

PMID: 39585057 PMC: 11587041. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16060098.


Insights into Parkinson's Disease-Related Freezing of Gait Detection and Prediction Approaches: A Meta Analysis.

Elbatanouny H, Kleanthous N, Dahrouj H, Alusi S, Almajali E, Mahmoud S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(12).

PMID: 38931743 PMC: 11207947. DOI: 10.3390/s24123959.


Freezing of gait assessment with inertial measurement units and deep learning: effect of tasks, medication states, and stops.

Yang P, Filtjens B, Ginis P, Goris M, Nieuwboer A, Gilat M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):24.

PMID: 38350964 PMC: 10865632. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01320-1.


The advantages of artificial intelligence-based gait assessment in detecting, predicting, and managing Parkinson's disease.

Wu P, Cao B, Liang Z, Wu M Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1191378.

PMID: 37502426 PMC: 10368956. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1191378.


Detection and assessment of Parkinson's disease based on gait analysis: A survey.

Guo Y, Yang J, Liu Y, Chen X, Yang G Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:916971.

PMID: 35992585 PMC: 9382193. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.916971.


References
1.
Bohle M, Eitel F, Weygandt M, Ritter K . Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Explaining Deep Neural Network Decisions in MRI-Based Alzheimer's Disease Classification. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019; 11:194. PMC: 6685087. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00194. View

2.
Spildooren J, Vercruysse S, Desloovere K, Vandenberghe W, Kerckhofs E, Nieuwboer A . Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: the impact of dual-tasking and turning. Mov Disord. 2010; 25(15):2563-70. DOI: 10.1002/mds.23327. View

3.
Fahn S . The freezing phenomenon in parkinsonism. Adv Neurol. 1995; 67:53-63. View

4.
Moore O, Kreitler S, Ehrenfeld M, Giladi N . Quality of life and gender identity in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2005; 112(11):1511-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-005-0285-5. View

5.
Arias P, Cudeiro J . Effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait in Parkinsonian patients with and without freezing of gait. PLoS One. 2010; 5(3):e9675. PMC: 2842293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009675. View