» Articles » PMID: 34875666

Evaluation of a Stepped Care Approach to Manage Depression and Diabetes Distress in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial (ECCE HOMO Study)

Overview
Publisher Karger
Specialties Pharmacology
Psychiatry
Date 2021 Dec 7
PMID 34875666
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Depression is a common and serious complication of diabetes. Treatment approaches addressing the specific demands of affected patients are scarce.

Objective: The aim of this work was to test whether a stepped care approach for patients with diabetes and depression and/or diabetes distress yields greater depression reduction than treatment-as-usual.

Methods: Two-hundred and sixty patients with diabetes and elevated depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥16) and/or elevated diabetes distress (PAID ≥40) were randomized to stepped care for depression or diabetes treatment-as-usual. The primary outcome was the rate of meaningful depression reduction at the 12-month follow-up according to the HAMD (score <9 or reduction by ≥50%). Secondary outcomes were changes in depression scores (HAMD/CES-D), diabetes distress (PAID), diabetes acceptance (AADQ), well-being (WHO-5), quality of life (EQ-5D/SF-36), self-care behavior (SDSCA/DSMQ), HbA1c, and biomarkers of inflammation.

Results: One-hundred and thirty-one individuals were assigned to stepped care and 129 to treatment-as-usual. Overall, 15.4% were lost to follow-up. Meaningful depression reduction was observed in 80.2 versus 51.2% in stepped care versus treatment-as-usual (p < 0.001, intention-to-treat analysis). Of the secondary measures, the HAMD (∆ -3.2, p < 0.001), WHO-5 (∆ 1.5, p = 0.007), and AADQ (∆ -1.0, p = 0.008) displayed significant treatment effects, while effects on CES-D (∆ -2.3, p = 0.065), PAID (∆ -3.5, p = 0.109), and SDSCA (∆ 0.20, p = 0.081) were not significantly different. Both groups showed comparable changes in EQ-5D/SF-36, DSMQ, HbA1c, and biomarkers of inflammation (all p ≥ 0.19).

Conclusions: The stepped care approach improved depression, well-being, and acceptance. The results support that increasing treatment intensity on demand is effective and can help provide more optimal treatment. The inclusion of diabetes-specific interventions may be beneficial for patients with diabetes and elevated depression.

Citing Articles

Associations between biomarkers of inflammation and depressive symptoms-potential differences between diabetes types and symptom clusters of depression.

Herder C, Zhu A, Schmitt A, Spagnuolo M, Kulzer B, Roden M Transl Psychiatry. 2025; 15(1):9.

PMID: 39799156 PMC: 11724873. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03209-y.


Validation of the Portuguese version of the diabetes self-management questionnaire-revised (DSMQ-R) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Oliveira D, Costa A, Henriques A, Curado M, Schmitt A, Nogueira P BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):405.

PMID: 39044279 PMC: 11267859. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01900-9.


Expressions of glycemic parameters, lipid profile, and thyroid hormone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and their correlation.

Chen H, Wu J, Lyu R Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024; 12(7):e1282.

PMID: 38967365 PMC: 11225078. DOI: 10.1002/iid3.1282.


Association between low birth weight and impaired glucose tolerance in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ma J, Wang Y, Mo M, Lian Z Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1362076.

PMID: 38783917 PMC: 11112083. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1362076.


The short- and long-term effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on the glycemic control of diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dong N, Wang X, Yang L Biopsychosoc Med. 2023; 17(1):18.

PMID: 37150826 PMC: 10165773. DOI: 10.1186/s13030-023-00274-5.