» Articles » PMID: 34873209

Quantitative Modeling of Carcinogenesis Induced by Single Beams or Mixtures of Space Radiations Using Targeted and Non-targeted Effects

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Dec 7
PMID 34873209
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ionizing radiations encountered by astronauts on deep space missions produce biological damage by two main mechanisms: (1) Targeted effects (TE) due to direct traversals of cells by ionizing tracks. (2) Non-targeted effects (NTE) caused by release of signals from directly hit cells. The combination of these mechanisms generates non-linear dose response shapes, which need to be modeled quantitatively to predict health risks from space exploration. Here we used a TE + NTE model to analyze data on APC mouse tumorigenesis induced by space-relevant doses of protons, He, C, O, Si or Fe ions, or γ rays. A customized weighted Negative Binomial distribution was used to describe the radiation type- and dose-dependent data variability. This approach allowed detailed quantification of dose-response shapes, NTE- and TE-related model parameters, and radiation quality metrics (relative biological effectiveness, RBE, and radiation effects ratio, RER, relative to γ rays) for each radiation type. Based on the modeled responses for each radiation type, we predicted the tumor yield for a Mars-mission-relevant mixture of these radiations, using the recently-developed incremental effect additivity (IEA) synergy theory. The proposed modeling approach can enhance current knowledge about quantification of space radiation quality effects, dose response shapes, and ultimately the health risks for astronauts.

Citing Articles

A competing risks machine learning study of neutron dose, fractionation, age, and sex effects on mortality in 21,000 mice.

Wang E, Shuryak I, Brenner D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17974.

PMID: 39095647 PMC: 11297256. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68717-9.


Radiation-induced bystander effect and its clinical implications.

Tang H, Cai L, He X, Niu Z, Huang H, Hu W Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1124412.

PMID: 37091174 PMC: 10113613. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1124412.


Biophysical Modeling of the Ionizing Radiation Influence on Cells Using the Stochastic (Monte Carlo) and Deterministic (Analytical) Approaches.

Fornalski K, Adamowski L, Bugala E, Jarmakiewicz R, Kirejczyk M, Kopycinski J Dose Response. 2022; 20(4):15593258221138506.

PMID: 36458282 PMC: 9706082. DOI: 10.1177/15593258221138506.


A Current Overview of the Biological Effects of Combined Space Environmental Factors in Mammals.

Xu Y, Pei W, Hu W Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:861006.

PMID: 35493084 PMC: 9039719. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.861006.

References
1.
Mothersill C, Rusin A, Fernandez-Palomo C, Seymour C . History of bystander effects research 1905-present; what is in a name?. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017; 94(8):696-707. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1398436. View

2.
Butterworth K, McMahon S, Hounsell A, OSullivan J, Prise K . Bystander signalling: exploring clinical relevance through new approaches and new models. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013; 25(10):586-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.06.005. View

3.
Cucinotta F, Cacao E . Non-Targeted Effects Models Predict Significantly Higher Mars Mission Cancer Risk than Targeted Effects Models. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1832. PMC: 5431989. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02087-3. View

4.
Suman S, Kumar S, Moon B, Strawn S, Thakor H, Fan Z . Relative Biological Effectiveness of Energetic Heavy Ions for Intestinal Tumorigenesis Shows Male Preponderance and Radiation Type and Energy Dependence in APC(1638N/+) Mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 95(1):131-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.057. View

5.
Azzam E . What does radiation biology tell us about potential health effects at low dose and low dose rates?. J Radiol Prot. 2019; 39(4):S28-S39. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab2b09. View