» Articles » PMID: 34871389

Patient-reported Diagnostic Intervals to Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in the Midland Region of New Zealand: a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Fam Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Dec 6
PMID 34871389
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: New Zealand (NZ) has high rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) but low rates of early detection. The majority of CRC is diagnosed through general practice, where lengthy diagnostic intervals are common. We investigated factors contributing to diagnostic delay in a cohort of patients newly diagnosed with CRC.

Methods: Patients were recruited from the Midland region and interviewed about their diagnostic experience using a questionnaire based on a modified Model of Pathways to Treatment framework and SYMPTOM questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the population characteristics. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression were used to analyse factors influencing diagnostic intervals.

Results: Data from 176 patients were analysed, of which 65 (36.9%) experienced a general practitioner (GP) diagnostic interval of >120 days and 96 (54.5%) experienced a total diagnostic interval (TDI) > 120 days. Patients reporting rectal bleeding were less likely to experience a long TDI (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.78) and appraisal/help-seeking interval (OR, 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59). Patients <60 were more likely to report a longer appraisal/help-seeking interval (OR, 3.32, 95% CI: 1.17-9.46). Female (OR, 2.19, 95% CI: 1.08-4.44) and Māori patients (OR, 3.18, 95% CI: 1.04-9.78) were more likely to experience a long GP diagnostic interval.

Conclusion: NZ patients with CRC can experience long diagnostic intervals, attributed to patient and health system factors. Young patients, Māori, females, and patients experiencing change of bowel habit may be at particular risk. We need to increase symptom awareness of CRC for patients and GPs. Concentrated efforts are needed to ensure equity for Māori in access to screening, diagnostics, and treatment.

References
1.
Pedersen A, Hansen R, Vedsted P . Patient delay in colorectal cancer patients: associations with rectal bleeding and thoughts about cancer. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e69700. PMC: 3718764. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069700. View

2.
Allison J, Fraser C, Halloran S, Young G . Population screening for colorectal cancer means getting FIT: the past, present, and future of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT). Gut Liver. 2014; 8(2):117-30. PMC: 3964261. DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.2.117. View

3.
Mounce L, Price S, Valderas J, Hamilton W . Comorbid conditions delay diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a cohort study using electronic primary care records. Br J Cancer. 2017; 116(12):1536-1543. PMC: 5518856. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.127. View

4.
Weller D, Vedsted P, Rubin G, Walter F, Emery J, Scott S . The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer. 2012; 106(7):1262-7. PMC: 3314787. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.68. View

5.
Jansen P, Bacal K, Buetow S . A comparison of Māori and non-Māori experiences of general practice. N Z Med J. 2011; 124(1330):24-9. View