» Articles » PMID: 34853238

Comparison of the Flexural and Surface Properties of Milled, 3D-printed, and Heat Polymerized PMMA Resins for Denture Bases: An in Vitro Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Dec 2
PMID 34853238
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the flexural properties and the adhesion of Lactobacillus salivarius (LS), Streptococcus mutans (SM), and Candida albicans (CA) on heat-polymerized (CV), CAD-CAM milled (CAD), or 3D-printed (3D) Poly (methylmethacrylate) (PMMA).

Methods: Ultimate Flexural Strength (UFS), Flexural Strain (FS) (%) at Flexural Strength, and Flexural Modulus (FM) of specimens (65.0×10.0×3.3 mm) from each PMMA group (n=6) were calculated by using the 3-point bending test. The surface roughness profiles (R) were measured before and after polishing with a contact profilometer. LS, SM, and CA adhesion on PMMA specimens (n=18) (10 mm in diameter, 3 mm in height) was assessed after 90 minutes and 16 hours by using scanning electron microscopy. The Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc analysis was performed to compare the groups (alpha=0.05).

Results: Mean UFS values were 80.79±7.64 MPa for CV, 110.23±5.03 MPa for CAD, and 87.34±6.39 MPa for 3D. Mean FS values were 4.37±1.04% for CV, 4.71±0.62% for CAD, and 6.19±0.13 % for 3D. Mean FM values were 2542±301 MPa for CV, 3435±346 MPa for CAD, and 2371±197 MPa for 3D. CAD had the lowest average R value (0.29±0.16 µm) before polishing, and bacterial adhesion after 90 minutes of incubation. R value and microbial adhesion were not different amongst groups after polishing and 16 hours of incubation, respectively.

Conclusion: The CAD group displayed the best flexural properties, except for FS, the lowest roughness before polishing and bacterial adhesion after 90 minutes of incubation. All tested PMMAs had similar surface roughness after polishing, and microbial adhesion after 16 hours of incubation.

Citing Articles

Influence of Surface Treatment and Protracted Ageing on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Two Digitally Fabricated (Milled and 3D-Printed) Polymethacrylate-Based Provisional Crowns.

Hassan N, Mattoo K, Khawaji A, Najmi H, Sadeli A, Alshahrani A Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076191 PMC: 11902808. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050699.


Evaluation of the effect of new generation denture base materials aged in artificial saliva at different pH levels on surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion.

Arslan E, Akay C, Erdonmez D, Avukat E BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):356.

PMID: 40055754 PMC: 11889897. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05700-4.


An In-Vitro Evaluation of Strength, Hardness, and Color Stability of Heat-Polymerized and 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymers After Aging.

Al-Ameri A, Alothman O, Alsadon O, Bangalore D Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940491 PMC: 11820030. DOI: 10.3390/polym17030288.


Effect of Orange Juice on the Properties of Heat-Polymerized and 3D-Printed Denture Materials.

Tosun B, Ozturk Z, Uysal N Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39795458 PMC: 11722772. DOI: 10.3390/polym17010056.


Mechanical Assessment of Denture Polymers Processing Technologies.

Modiga C, Stoia A, Leretter M, Chis A, Ardelean A, Azar E J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39194672 PMC: 11355463. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15080234.