» Articles » PMID: 34853100

Common Elements of Service Delivery Models That Optimise Quality of Life and Health Service Use Among Older People with Advanced Progressive Conditions: a Tertiary Systematic Review

Abstract

Introduction: Health and social care services worldwide need to support ageing populations to live well with advanced progressive conditions while adapting to functional decline and finitude. We aimed to identify and map common elements of effective geriatric and palliative care services and consider their scalability and generalisability to high, middle and low-income countries.

Methods: Tertiary systematic review (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Embase, January 2000-October 2019) of studies in geriatric or palliative care that demonstrated improved quality of life and/or health service use outcomes among older people with advanced progressive conditions. Using frameworks for health system analysis, service elements were identified. We used a staged, iterative process to develop a 'common components' logic model and consulted experts in geriatric or palliative care from high, middle and low-income countries on its scalability.

Results: 78 studies (59 geriatric and 19 palliative) spanning all WHO regions were included. Data were available from 17 739 participants. Nearly half the studies recruited patients with heart failure (n=36) and one-third recruited patients with mixed diagnoses (n=26). Common service elements (≥80% of studies) included collaborative working, ongoing assessment, active patient participation, patient/family education and patient self-management. Effective services incorporated patient engagement, patient goal-driven care and the centrality of patient needs. Stakeholders (n=20) emphasised that wider implementation of such services would require access to skilled, multidisciplinary teams with sufficient resource to meet patients' needs. Identified barriers to scalability included the political and societal will to invest in and prioritise palliative and geriatric care for older people, alongside geographical and socioeconomic factors.

Conclusion: Our logic model combines elements of effective services to achieve optimal quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions. The model transcends current best practice in geriatric and palliative care and applies across the care continuum, from prevention of functional decline to end-of-life care.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42020150252.

Citing Articles

Psychological interventions for emotional well-being in adults with advanced progressive life-limiting illness.

Janjua S, Dancyger C, Mateus M, McInnerney D, Carter D, Tookman A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 10:CD015421.

PMID: 39351880 PMC: 11443590. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015421.


Benefits of specialist palliative care by identifying active ingredients of service composition, structure, and delivery model: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Johnson M, Rutterford L, Sunny A, Pask S, de Wolf-Linder S, Murtagh F PLoS Med. 2024; 21(8):e1004436.

PMID: 39093900 PMC: 11329153. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004436.


The impact of long-term care interventions on healthcare utilisation among older persons: a scoping review of reviews.

Balqis-Ali N, Jawahir S, Chan Y, Lim A, Azlan U, Shaffie S BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):484.

PMID: 38831269 PMC: 11145838. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05097-9.


Integration of primary care and palliative care services to improve equality and equity at the end-of-life: Findings from realist stakeholder workshops.

Mitchell S, Turner N, Fryer K, Aunger J, Beng J, Couchman E Palliat Med. 2024; 38(8):830-841.

PMID: 38733139 PMC: 11448105. DOI: 10.1177/02692163241248962.


How is community based 'out-of-hours' care provided to patients with advanced illness near the end of life: A systematic review of care provision.

Firth A, Lin C, Yi D, Goodrich J, Gaczkowska I, Waite F Palliat Med. 2023; 37(3):310-328.

PMID: 36924146 PMC: 10126468. DOI: 10.1177/02692163231154760.


References
1.
Kavalieratos D, Corbelli J, Zhang D, Dionne-Odom J, Ernecoff N, Hanmer J . Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016; 316(20):2104-2114. PMC: 5226373. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.16840. View

2.
Nottelmann L, Groenvold M, Vejlgaard T, Petersen M, Jensen L . Early, integrated palliative rehabilitation improves quality of life of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer: The Pal-Rehab randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med. 2021; 35(7):1344-1355. DOI: 10.1177/02692163211015574. View

3.
Comas-Herrera A, Fernandez J, Hancock R, Hatton C, Knapp M, McDaid D . COVID-19: Implications for the Support of People with Social Care Needs in England. J Aging Soc Policy. 2020; 32(4-5):365-372. DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1759759. View

4.
Kassianos A, Ioannou M, Koutsantoni M, Charalambous H . The impact of specialized palliative care on cancer patients' health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2017; 26(1):61-79. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3895-1. View

5.
Cohen L . Racial/ethnic disparities in hospice care: a systematic review. J Palliat Med. 2008; 11(5):763-8. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0216. View