» Articles » PMID: 34852039

Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Surgical Technique and Short-term Experience from 329 Cases

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Dec 1
PMID 34852039
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: minimally invasive bariatric surgery is clearly superior over open procedures including better early outcomes. Different surgical approaches are used to treat the severely obese, having Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) being a highly frequent procedure. Robotic surgery overcomes some laparoscopic limitations adding ergonomics, articulating instruments and a three-dimensional high definition camera. Based on our vast robotic experience, we present our referred group case series and a standardized Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rRYGB) technique as well as its outcomes.

Methods: a review of a prospective maintained database was conducted in patients submitted to robotic Roux en Y bariatric surgery between April 2015 and July 2019. Surgical technique is described and illustrated. We also reported patients demographics, outcomes and its follow-up.

Results: a Retrospective analysis identified 329 patients submitted to Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Both da Vinci Si and Xi platforms were used. Mean age was 34.4 years, with median BMI of 44.2 kg/m2. Mean console time was 102 min and there was no conversion. No surgical hospital readmission rates were seen in the first 30 days.

Conclusion: this study represents our initial experience of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rRYGB), its short outcomes and a standardized surgical technique. Our results encourage that rRYGB is technically feasible and safe, and might offer some advantages showing good outcomes and minimal complications.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the evolution of psychomotor skills in the robotic surgery simulation process.

Araujo Silva D, Szutan L, Zandonai A J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):317.

PMID: 39123078 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02069-4.


A Systematic Review to Summarise and Appraise the Reporting of Surgical Innovation: a Case Study in Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Huttman M, Smith A, Robertson H, Purves R, Biggs S, Dewi F Obes Surg. 2024; 34(8):3058-3070.

PMID: 38898310 PMC: 11289006. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07329-8.

References
1.
Sanchez-Santos R, Estevez S, Tome C, Gonzalez S, Brox A, Nicolas R . Training programs influence in the learning curve of laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2011; 22(1):34-41. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0398-x. View

2.
Zhu X, Yan P, Yao L, Liu R, Wu D, Du B . Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer. Surg Innov. 2018; 26(1):57-65. DOI: 10.1177/1553350618797822. View

3.
Cadiere G, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Favretti F . The world's first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg. 1999; 9(2):206-9. DOI: 10.1381/096089299765553539. View

4.
Banka G, Woodard G, Hernandez-Boussard T, Morton J . Laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass surgery: differences in patient demographics, safety, and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2012; 147(6):550-6. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.195. View

5.
Economopoulos K, Theocharidis V, McKenzie T, Sergentanis T, Psaltopoulou T . Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg. 2015; 25(11):2180-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1870-9. View