» Articles » PMID: 34851366

Checklist for Evaluation of Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Reports in Dermatology: CLEAR Derm Consensus Guidelines From the International Skin Imaging Collaboration Artificial Intelligence Working Group

Abstract

Importance: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is accelerating in all aspects of medicine and has the potential to transform clinical care and dermatology workflows. However, to develop image-based algorithms for dermatology applications, comprehensive criteria establishing development and performance evaluation standards are required to ensure product fairness, reliability, and safety.

Objective: To consolidate limited existing literature with expert opinion to guide developers and reviewers of dermatology AI.

Evidence Review: In this consensus statement, the 19 members of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration AI working group volunteered to provide a consensus statement. A systematic PubMed search was performed of English-language articles published between December 1, 2008, and August 24, 2021, for "artificial intelligence" and "reporting guidelines," as well as other pertinent studies identified by the expert panel. Factors that were viewed as critical to AI development and performance evaluation were included and underwent 2 rounds of electronic discussion to achieve consensus.

Findings: A checklist of items was developed that outlines best practices of image-based AI development and assessment in dermatology.

Conclusions And Relevance: Clinically effective AI needs to be fair, reliable, and safe; this checklist of best practices will help both developers and reviewers achieve this goal.

Citing Articles

Policy Challenges in Ultra-Rare Cancers: Ethical, Social, and Legal Implications of Melanoma Prevention and Diagnosis in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

Refolo P, Raimondi C, Battaglia L, Borras J, Closa P, Lo Scalzo A Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942510 PMC: 11818049. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030321.


AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Jacob C, Brasier N, Laurenzi E, Heuss S, Mougiakakou S, Coltekin A J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e67485.

PMID: 39909417 PMC: 11840377. DOI: 10.2196/67485.


Diagnostic performance of generative pretrained transformer -4 with vision technology versus board-certified dermatologists: A comparative analysis using dermoscopic and clinical images.

Block B, Powers C, Chang A, Campbell C, Piontkowski A, Orloff J JAAD Int. 2025; 18():142-144.

PMID: 39790862 PMC: 11713480. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2024.10.006.


Artificial Intelligence in the Non-Invasive Detection of Melanoma.

Mendi B, Kose K, Fleshner L, Adam R, Safai B, Farabi B Life (Basel). 2025; 14(12).

PMID: 39768310 PMC: 11678477. DOI: 10.3390/life14121602.


DERM12345: A Large, Multisource Dermatoscopic Skin Lesion Dataset with 40 Subclasses.

Yilmaz A, Yasar S, Gencoglan G, Temelkuran B Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1302.

PMID: 39609462 PMC: 11604664. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-04104-3.


References
1.
Roy A, Ren J, Azizi S, Loh A, Natarajan V, Mustafa B . Does your dermatology classifier know what it doesn't know? Detecting the long-tail of unseen conditions. Med Image Anal. 2021; 75:102274. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102274. View

2.
Kelly B, Judge C, Bollard S, Clifford S, Healy G, Yeom K . Radiology artificial intelligence, a systematic evaluation of methods (RAISE): a systematic review protocol. Insights Imaging. 2020; 11(1):133. PMC: 7726044. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00929-9. View

3.
Elder D, Piepkorn M, Barnhill R, Longton G, Nelson H, Knezevich S . Pathologist characteristics associated with accuracy and reproducibility of melanocytic skin lesion interpretation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018; 79(1):52-59.e5. PMC: 6016831. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.070. View

4.
Wawira Gichoya J, McCoy L, Celi L, Ghassemi M . Equity in essence: a call for operationalising fairness in machine learning for healthcare. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021; 28(1). PMC: 8733939. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100289. View

5.
Campbell J, Lee A, Abramoff M, Keane P, Ting D, Lum F . Reporting Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Research. Ophthalmology. 2020; 127(12):1596-1599. PMC: 7875521. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.009. View