The Precipitous Decline in Reasoning and Other Key Abilities with Age and Its Implications for Federal Judges

Overview

Journal J Intell

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2021 Nov 29

PMID 34842740

Authors

Alan S Kaufman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

U. S. Supreme Court justices and other federal judges are, effectively, appointed for life, with no built-in check on their cognitive functioning as they approach old age. There is about a century of research on aging and intelligence that shows the vulnerability of processing speed, fluid reasoning, visual-spatial processing, and working memory to normal aging for men and women at all levels of education; even the maintained ability of crystallized knowledge declines in old age. The vulnerable abilities impact a person's decision-making and problem solving; crystallized knowledge, by contrast, measures a person's general knowledge. The aging-IQ data provide a rationale for assessing the key cognitive abilities of anyone who is appointed to the federal judiciary. Theories of multiple cognitive abilities and processes, most notably the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model, provide a well-researched blueprint for interpreting the plethora of findings from studies of IQ and aging. Sophisticated technical advances in test construction, especially in item-response theory and computerized-adaptive testing, allow for the development of reliable and valid theory-based tests of cognitive functioning. Such assessments promise to be a potentially useful tool for evaluating federal judges to assess the impact of aging on their ability to perform at a level their positions deserve, perhaps to measure their competency to serve the public intelligently. It is proposed that public funding be made available to appoint a panel of experts to develop and validate an array of computerized cognitive tests to identify those justices who are at risk of cognitive impairment.

References

McArdle J, Grimm K, Hamagami F, Bowles R, Meredith W . Modeling life-span growth curves of cognition using longitudinal data with multiple samples and changing scales of measurement. Psychol Methods. 2009; 14(2):126-49. PMC: 2831479. DOI: 10.1037/a0015857. View

Salthouse T . Evaluating the correspondence of different cognitive batteries. Assessment. 2013; 21(2):131-42. PMC: 4293370. DOI: 10.1177/1073191113486690. View

Anstey K, Christensen H . Education, activity, health, blood pressure and apolipoprotein E as predictors of cognitive change in old age: a review. Gerontology. 2000; 46(3):163-77. DOI: 10.1159/000022153. View

Salthouse T . When does age-related cognitive decline begin?. Neurobiol Aging. 2009; 30(4):507-14. PMC: 2683339. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023. View

Hambrick D, Engle R . Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: an investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cogn Psychol. 2002; 44(4):339-87. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0769. View

Baltes P, Staudinger U, Lindenberger U . Lifespan psychology: theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 50:471-507. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471. View

Schaie K . "When does age-related cognitive decline begin?" Salthouse again reifies the "cross-sectional fallacy". Neurobiol Aging. 2009; 30(4):528-9. PMC: 2680669. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.12.012. View

Salthouse T . Selective review of cognitive aging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010; 16(5):754-60. PMC: 3637655. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617710000706. View

Beier M, Ackerman P . Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychol Aging. 2005; 20(2):341-355. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.341. View

10.

Salthouse T, Pink J, Tucker-Drob E . Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence. Intelligence. 2009; 36(5):464-486. PMC: 2615402. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.003. View

11.

Arbuckle T, Maag U, Pushkar D, Chaikelson J . Individual differences in trajectory of intellectual development over 45 years of adulthood. Psychol Aging. 1999; 13(4):663-75. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.663. View

12.

Richardson K, Norgate S . Does IQ Really Predict Job Performance?. Appl Dev Sci. 2015; 19(3):153-169. PMC: 4557354. DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2014.983635. View

13.

Ronnlund M, Nyberg L, Backman L, Nilsson L . Stability, growth, and decline in adult life span development of declarative memory: cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a population-based study. Psychol Aging. 2005; 20(1):3-18. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.3. View

14.

Wright A . Equivalence of remote, digital administration and traditional, in-person administration of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V). Psychol Assess. 2020; 32(9):809-817. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000939. View

15.

Kaufman A, Kaufman J, Liu X, Johnson C . How do educational attainment and gender relate to fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and academic skills at ages 22-90 years?. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24(2):153-63. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acp015. View

16.

Humphreys L . Critique of Cattell's "theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: a critical experiment". J Educ Psychol. 1967; 58(3):129-36. DOI: 10.1037/h0024654. View

17.

Salthouse T . Why are there different age relations in cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of cognitive functioning?. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014; 23(4):252-256. PMC: 4219741. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414535212. View

18.

Kaufman A, Horn J . Age changes on tests of fluid and crystallized ability for women and men on the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT) at ages 17-94 years. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996; 11(2):97-121. View

19.

Horn J, Cattell R . Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1967; 26(2):107-29. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90011-x. View

20.

Sternberg R . A Theory of Adaptive Intelligence and Its Relation to General Intelligence. J Intell. 2019; 7(4). PMC: 6963795. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence7040023. View