» Articles » PMID: 34837880

Repeal of State Laws Permitting Denial of Health Claims Resulting from Alcohol Impairment: Impact on Treatment Utilization

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34837880
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many states in the U.S. still have Alcohol Exclusion Laws (AELs), which allow insurance companies to deny health claims resulting from alcohol impairment. There are concerns that this form of structural stigmatization affects alcohol treatment-seeking behaviors. We examined the effects of AEL repeal on treatment admissions for alcohol use disorder (AUD).

Methods: Data on alcohol treatment admissions from 1992 to 2017 were obtained from the Treatment Episode Data Set. The state-level aggregate number of treatment admissions was derived, including healthcare professional referrals only, self-referrals only, and both self-referral and healthcare professional referrals. The number of treatment admissions by health insurance status (private, public, and uninsured) was also calculated. The study used a difference-in-differences (DID) quasi-experimental design.

Results: The DID analysis showed that the number of admissions for alcohol treatment from healthcare professional referrals increased 16% in the AEL repeal states compared to states with AELs or that never had AELs (IRR=1.16, 95% CI=1.07, 1.25). These results were consistent for analysis by payment sources. In particular, treatment admissions from healthcare professional referrals for patients covered by private insurance increased about 38% in states with AEL repeal (IRR=1.38, 95% CI=1.17, 1.64) compared to states without AEL repeal. However, the findings were no longer significant when the state-specific time trends were taken into account.

Conclusions: This study documented that AEL repeal may have had a significant impact on the number of treatment admissions for AUD. These findings suggest that AELs function as a barrier to treatment-seeking behavior.

Citing Articles

Treatment Referrals Post-prohibition of Alcohol Exclusion Laws: Evidence from Colorado and Illinois.

Azagba S, Ebling T, Shan L, Hall M, Wolfson M J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(9):1649-1656.

PMID: 38169024 PMC: 11254860. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08544-2.


Health claims denial for alcohol intoxication: State laws and structural stigma.

Azagba S, Ebling T, Hall M Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023; 47(9):1748-1755.

PMID: 38051148 PMC: 10699208. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15153.


Alcohol, liver and health insurance.

Lahoti D, Bhople N, Kumar S Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023; 42(3):440-441.

PMID: 37145235 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01351-x.


Does state repeal of alcohol exclusion laws increase problem drinking?.

Azagba S, Shan L, Ebling T, Wolfson M, Hall M, Chaloupka F Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022; 46(11):2103-2109.

PMID: 36433923 PMC: 10099925. DOI: 10.1111/acer.14942.

References
1.
Greene W, Oyetunji T, Bowers U, Haider A, Mellman T, Cornwell E . Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma. Am J Surg. 2010; 199(4):554-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005. View

2.
Wogen J, Restrepo M . Human Rights, Stigma, and Substance Use. Health Hum Rights. 2020; 22(1):51-60. PMC: 7348456. View

3.
Hazlitt M, Hill J, Gunter O, Guillamondegui O . Disparities in trauma: the impact of socioeconomic factors on outcomes following traumatic hollow viscus injury. J Surg Res. 2014; 191(1):6-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.052. View

4.
Wolfson M, Wagoner K, Song E, Pankratz M, Azagba S . Methods for Population Research on Substance Use and Consequences. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2020; 258:1-29. DOI: 10.1007/164_2019_319. View

5.
Gentilello L, Donato A, Nolan S, Mackin R, Liebich F, Hoyt D . Effect of the Uniform Accident and Sickness Policy Provision Law on alcohol screening and intervention in trauma centers. J Trauma. 2005; 59(3):624-31. View