» Articles » PMID: 34836141

Validation of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Romanian Adult Population

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34836141
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: Obesity, part of the triple global burden of disease, is increasingly attracting research on its preventive and curative management. Knowledge of eating behavior can be useful both at the individual level (to individualize treatment for obesity) and the population level (to implement more suitable food policies). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) is a widely used international tool to assess eating behavior, i.e., emotional, external and restricted eating styles. The aim of this study was to validate the Romanian version of DEBQ, as obesity is a major concern in Romania. (2) Methods: Our study tested the psychometric properties of the Romanian version of DEBQ on an adult population and explored the associations of eating behavior with weight status (3) Results: The study showed a factor load similar to the original version of the questionnaire and a very good internal validity (Cronbach's alpha fidelity coefficient greater than 0.8 for all scales of the questionnaire) for the Romanian version of DEBQ and showed that all of the scales positively correlated with body mass index in both men and women. (4) Conclusions: This study will enable the use of the DEBQ Romanian version on the adult population of Romania where the findings could be incorporated into developing better strategies to reduce the burden of nutrition-related diseases.

Citing Articles

Association between Diet Quality and Eating Behavior in Type 2 Diabetes Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Gal A, Arhire L, Gherasim A, Graur M, Nita O, Dumitrascu O Nutrients. 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 38999795 PMC: 11243329. DOI: 10.3390/nu16132047.


Italian validation of a short version of the Dutch eating behavior questionnaire: Psychometric properties and relationships with self-esteem, eating self-efficacy, and snacking habits in university students.

Canova L, Bobbio A, Beninca A, Manganelli A Health Psychol Open. 2024; 11:20551029241262665.

PMID: 38898885 PMC: 11186392. DOI: 10.1177/20551029241262665.


Understanding the Interplay of Dietary Intake and Eating Behavior in Type 2 Diabetes.

Gal A, Iatcu C, Popa A, Arhire L, Mihalache L, Gherasim A Nutrients. 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38542683 PMC: 10975878. DOI: 10.3390/nu16060771.


The melanocortin-4 receptor pathway and the emergence of precision medicine in obesity management.

Fansa S, Acosta A Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 26 Suppl 2:46-63.

PMID: 38504134 PMC: 11893075. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15555.


Reliability and validity of the in an online format for university students from low-income regions in a pandemic context: A 24 hour MESYN study.

de Carvalho M, Cardoso A, Feuerstein S, de Sousa R, Collese T, Torres-Leal F Front Epidemiol. 2024; 2:1036631.

PMID: 38455304 PMC: 10911036. DOI: 10.3389/fepid.2022.1036631.


References
1.
Rosengren A . Obesity and cardiovascular health: the size of the problem. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(34):3404-3406. PMC: 8423455. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab518. View

2.
Bohrer B, Forbush K, Hunt T . Are common measures of dietary restraint and disinhibited eating reliable and valid in obese persons?. Appetite. 2015; 87:344-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.226. View

3.
Green A, Larkin M, Sullivan V . Oh stuff it! The experience and explanation of diet failure: an exploration using interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Health Psychol. 2009; 14(7):997-1008. DOI: 10.1177/1359105309342293. View

4.
Stunkard A . Physical activity, emotions, and human obesity. Psychosom Med. 1958; 20(5):366-72. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-195809000-00004. View

5.
Wardle J . Eating style: a validation study of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in normal subjects and women with eating disorders. J Psychosom Res. 1987; 31(2):161-9. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(87)90072-9. View