» Articles » PMID: 34832587

A Comparison of Peripheral Blood Smears, Autologous Cell Cultures, and Reverse Line Blot Hybridisation in Screening for / in Roaming Dogs and Symptomatic Dogs in Trinidad

Overview
Journal Pathogens
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34832587
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compared two methods to detect cases of canine ehrlichiosis in a field setting. One method was a polymerase chain reaction for the 16S rRNA gene followed by reverse line blot hybridisation with genera and species-specific probes for . The second method was an autologous cell culture of peripheral leucocytes isolated from heparinised blood and maintained in a homologous canine serum in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium without antibiotics. The cultures were examined under light microscopy for inclusion bodies after 48 h. Leucocytes were successfully propagated for 20 of the 34 samples submitted for autologous cell culture. Inclusion bodies were observed after cell culture in leucocytes of eight dogs. Two dogs were positive to the genera probe and six dogs were positive to the probe after reverse line blot hybridisation. There was acceptable agreement between reverse line blot hybridisation and cell culture results. Both reverse line blot hybridisation and autologous cell cultures can be used to detect in subclinical and clinical cases of disease. A definitive diagnosis of is best achieved by a combination of clinical signs, positive autologous cell culture, and reverse line blot hybridisation results.

Citing Articles

Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens.

Diaz-Sanchez A, Obregon D, Santos H, Corona-Gonzalez B Pathogens. 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 37242303 PMC: 10223951. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12050633.

References
1.
Mylonakis M, Koutinas A, Billinis C, Leontides L, Kontos V, Papadopoulos O . Evaluation of cytology in the diagnosis of acute canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): a comparison between five methods. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 91(2-3):197-204. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00298-5. View

2.
Harrus S, Kass P, Klement E, Waner T . Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: a retrospective study of 100 cases, and an epidemiological investigation of prognostic indicators for the disease. Vet Rec. 1997; 141(14):360-3. DOI: 10.1136/vr.141.14.360. View

3.
Georges K, Ezeokoli C, Newaj-Fyzul A, Campbell M, Mootoo N, Mutani A . The application of PCR and reverse line blot hybridization to detect arthropod-borne hemopathogens of dogs and cats in Trinidad. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1149:196-9. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1428.082. View

4.
Bekker C, de Vos S, Taoufik A, Sparagano O, Jongejan F . Simultaneous detection of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species in ruminants and detection of Ehrlichia ruminantium in Amblyomma variegatum ticks by reverse line blot hybridization. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 89(2-3):223-38. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00179-7. View

5.
Price J, Dolan T . A comparison of the efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate and tetracycline hydrochloride in the treatment of canine ehrlichiosis. Vet Rec. 1980; 107(12):275-7. DOI: 10.1136/vr.107.12.275. View