» Articles » PMID: 34828655

Higher Versus Lower Oxygen Concentration During Respiratory Support in the Delivery Room in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Pilot Feasibility Study

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34828655
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Optimal starting oxygen concentration for delivery room resuscitation of extremely preterm infants (<29 weeks) remains unknown, with recommendations of 21-30% based on uncertain evidence. Individual patient randomized trials designed to answer this question have been hampered by poor enrolment.

Hypothesis: It is feasible to compare 30% vs. 60% starting oxygen for delivery room resuscitation of extremely preterm infants using a change in local hospital policy and deferred consent approach.

Study Design: Prospective, single-center, feasibility study, with each starting oxygen concentration used for two months for all eligible infants.

Population: Infants born at 23 + 0-28 + 6 weeks' gestation who received delivery room resuscitation. Study interventions: Initial oxygen at 30% or 60%, increasing by 10-20% every minute for heart rate < 100 bpm, or increase to 100% for chest compressions.

Primary Outcome: Feasibility, defined by (i) achieving difference in cumulative supplied oxygen concentration between groups, and (ii) post-intervention rate consent >50%.

Results: Thirty-four infants were born during a 4-month period; consent was obtained in 63%. Thirty ( = 12, 30% group; = 18, 60% group) were analyzed, including limited data from eight who died or were transferred before parents could be approached. Median cumulative oxygen concentrations were significantly different between the two groups in the first 5 min.

Conclusion: Randomized control trial of 30% or 60% oxygen at the initiation of resuscitation of extremely preterm neonates with deferred consent is feasible.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03706586.

Citing Articles

Does the use of higher versus lower oxygen concentration improve neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18-24 months in very low birthweight infants?.

Schmolzer G, Asztalos E, Beltempo M, Boix H, Dempsey E, El-Naggar W Trials. 2024; 25(1):237.

PMID: 38576007 PMC: 10996184. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08080-2.


Optimizing Care for the Preterm Infant.

Asztalos E Children (Basel). 2022; 9(6).

PMID: 35740715 PMC: 9221890. DOI: 10.3390/children9060778.


Effects of Arterial Carbon Dioxide Tension on Cerebral and Somatic Regional Tissue Oxygenation and Blood Flow in Neonates After the Norwood Procedure With Deep Hypothermic Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Hoffman G, Scott J, Stuth E Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:762739.

PMID: 35223690 PMC: 8873518. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.762739.


Neonatal Resuscitation in Children 2021: Focus on Training, Technology, and New Clinical Approaches.

Trevisanuto D, Ramaswamy V, Villani P Children (Basel). 2022; 9(2).

PMID: 35204896 PMC: 8870172. DOI: 10.3390/children9020175.

References
1.
Oei J, Vento M, Rabi Y, Wright I, Finer N, Rich W . Higher or lower oxygen for delivery room resuscitation of preterm infants below 28 completed weeks gestation: a meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016; 102(1):F24-F30. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310435. View

2.
Wyckoff M, Wyllie J, Aziz K, de Almeida M, Fabres J, Fawke J . Neonatal Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2020; 142(16_suppl_1):S185-S221. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000895. View

3.
Saugstad O, Ramji S, Vento M . Oxygen for newborn resuscitation: how much is enough?. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(2):789-92. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-0832. View

4.
den Boer M, Houtlosser M, Foglia E, Davis P, van Kaam A, Kamlin C . Deferred consent for the enrolment of neonates in delivery room studies: strengthening the approach. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019; 104(4):F348-F352. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316461. View

5.
Vento M, Saugstad O . Oxygen supplementation in the delivery room: updated information. J Pediatr. 2011; 158(2 Suppl):e5-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.11.004. View