» Articles » PMID: 34827189

Performance Profile Among Age Categories in Young Cyclists

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Nov 27
PMID 34827189
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endurance profile assessment is of major interest to evaluate the cyclist's performance potential. In this regard, maximal oxygen uptake and functional threshold power are useful functional parameters to determine metabolic training zones (ventilatory threshold). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the physiological profile of different road cyclist age categories (Youth, Junior, and Under-23) to obtain the performance requirements. Sixty-one competitive road cyclists (15-22 years) performed a maximal incremental test on a bike in order to determine functional parameters (maximal fat oxidation zone, ventilatory thresholds, maximal oxygen uptake, and functional threshold power) and metabolic training zones. The results suggest major differences, with the Youth group showing clear changes in all metabolic zones except in fat oxidation. The main differences between Under-23 vs. Junior groups were observed in maximal relative power output (Under-23: 6.70 W·Kg; Junior: 6.17 W·Kg) and relative functional threshold power (Under-23: 4.91 W·Kg; Junior: 4.48 W·Kg). The Youth group physiological profile is clearly different to the other age categories. Some parameters normalized to body weight (maximal oxygen consumption, load and functional threshold power) could be interesting to predict a sporting career during the Junior and Under-23 stages.

Citing Articles

Biological Mechanisms Underlying Physical Fitness and Sports Performance: An Editorial.

Badicu G, Clemente F, Murawska-Cialowicz E Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(10).

PMID: 36290329 PMC: 9598305. DOI: 10.3390/biology11101425.


Comparative analysis of endurance, strength and body composition indicators in professional, under-23 and junior cyclists.

Alejo L, Montalvo-Perez A, Valenzuela P, Revuelta C, Ozcoidi L, de la Calle V Front Physiol. 2022; 13:945552.

PMID: 35991188 PMC: 9388719. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.945552.

References
1.
Lucia A, Joyos H, Chicharro J . Physiological response to professional road cycling: climbers vs. time trialists. Int J Sports Med. 2000; 21(7):505-12. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7420. View

2.
Denham J, Scott-Hamilton J, Hagstrom A, Gray A . Cycling Power Outputs Predict Functional Threshold Power and Maximum Oxygen Uptake. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; 34(12):3489-3497. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002253. View

3.
Padilla S, Mujika I, Cuesta G, Goiriena J . Level ground and uphill cycling ability in professional road cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31(6):878-85. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00017. View

4.
Millet G . [Physiological differences between cycling and running]. Rev Med Suisse. 2009; 5(212):1564-7. View

5.
Perez-Landaluce J, Fernandez-Garcia B, Rodriguez-Alonso M, GARCIA-HERRERO F, Patterson A, Terrados N . Physiological differences and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in professional, amateur and young cyclists. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002; 42(4):389-95. View