Recruitment Cost and Outcomes for an Arthritis Work Disability Prevention Randomized Clinical Trial: The Work It Study

Overview

Journal Contemp Clin Trials Commun

Date 2021 Nov 26

PMID 34825102

Authors

Rawan AlHeresh

Molly W Vaughan

Inbar Hanouna Brenner

Julie Keysor

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite the recommendations to increase recruitment of participants into clinical trials, investigators face costly challenges in trials investigating work disability interventions for people with arthritis and rheumatological conditions. This study aims to evaluate the recruitment costs and outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of an arthritis work disability prevention program conducted between 2011 and 2015, to inform planning and monitoring recruitment in similar studies.

Methods: Data were obtained from enrollment and financial records pertaining to recruitment costs for each recruitment approach employed. The cost for each recruitment method was calculated for total cost and cost per number of participants screened, eligible, and enrolled in the trial. Then the yield of each possible recruitment method was also determined based on the ratio of the number of randomized participants divided by the number of people contacted through each recruitment method. Finally, the.

Results: Recruitment rate was lower than projected. Community advertising, specifically newspapers, was the most successful method of recruitment in terms of numbers, but social media, specifically Craigslist, was the least costly method used to recruit. Some social media approaches, including Facebook and LinkedIn, yielded few if any participants. Recruitment efforts used successfully in the past are not always effective.

Conclusions: Costs to recruit large numbers of people with arthritis into clinical trials are high. Investigators are encouraged to monitor recruitment efforts and evaluate the costs and outcomes of their strategies throughout the study period. Close consideration to recruitment costs should be considered as part of the research fiscal resources prior to and during the study period for long-term outcomes like work disability.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01387100, date: 06/01/2011.

References

Allaire S, Keysor J . Development of a structured interview tool to help patients identify and solve rheumatic condition-related work barriers. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 61(7):988-95. DOI: 10.1002/art.24610. View

Keysor J, LaValley M, Brown C, Felson D, Alheresh R, Vaughan M . Efficacy of a Work Disability Prevention Program for People with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Single-Blind Parallel-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017; 70(7):1022-1029. PMC: 6374024. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23423. View

Marsh A, Lovato L, Glynn N, Kennedy K, Castro C, Domanchuk K . Lifestyle interventions and independence for elders study: recruitment and baseline characteristics. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013; 68(12):1549-58. PMC: 3814232. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glt064. View

McDonald A, Treweek S, Shakur H, Free C, Knight R, Speed C . Using a business model approach and marketing techniques for recruitment to clinical trials. Trials. 2011; 12:74. PMC: 3063210. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-74. View

Martikainen J, Kautiainen H, Rantalaiho V, Puolakka K . Longterm Work Productivity Costs Due to Absenteeism and Permanent Work Disability in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Register Study of 7831 Patients. J Rheumatol. 2016; 43(12):2101-2105. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160103. View

Keysor J, AlHeresh R, Vaughan M, LaValley M, Allaire S . The Work-It Study for people with arthritis: Study protocol and baseline sample characteristics. Work. 2016; 54(2):473-80. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-162331. View

Burton W, Morrison A, Maclean R, Ruderman E . Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis. Occup Med (Lond). 2005; 56(1):18-27. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqi171. View

McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J . What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006; 7:9. PMC: 1475627. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9. View

Stein M, Shaffer M, Echo-Hawk A, Smith J, Stapleton A, Melvin A . Research START: A Multimethod Study of Barriers and Accelerators of Recruiting Research Participants. Clin Transl Sci. 2015; 8(6):647-54. PMC: 4753776. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12351. View

10.

Ariza-Ariza R, Hernandez-Cruz B, Collantes E, Batlle E, Fernandez-Sueiro J, Gratacos J . Work disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2009; 36(11):2512-6. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090481. View

11.

Al Dhanhani A, Gignac M, Su J, Fortin P . Work disability in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 61(3):378-85. DOI: 10.1002/art.24347. View

12.

Sanders K, Stuart A, Merriman E, Read M, Kotowicz M, Young D . Trials and tribulations of recruiting 2,000 older women onto a clinical trial investigating falls and fractures: Vital D study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9:78. PMC: 2790455. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-78. View

13.

Caldwell P, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig J . Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(11):e1000368. PMC: 2976724. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368. View

14.

Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, Delaney B, Wilson S, Lassen A . How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam Pract. 2003; 20(1):83-92. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/20.1.83. View

15.

Toerien M, Brookes S, Metcalfe C, de Salis I, Tomlin Z, Peters T . A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials. 2009; 10:52. PMC: 2717957. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-52. View

16.

Campbell M, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald A, Knight R . Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(48):iii, ix-105. DOI: 10.3310/hta11480. View

17.

Kakumanu S, Manns B, Tran S, Saunders-Smith T, Hemmelgarn B, Tonelli M . Cost analysis and efficacy of recruitment strategies used in a large pragmatic community-based clinical trial targeting low-income seniors: a comparative descriptive analysis. Trials. 2019; 20(1):577. PMC: 6781395. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3652-5. View

18.

Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Kjeldstrom M, Johansen M . Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(2). PMC: 3586125. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360. View

19.

Sully B, Julious S, Nicholl J . A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013; 14:166. PMC: 3691846. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166. View

20.

Adams M, Caffrey L, McKevitt C . Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015; 13:8. PMC: 4429658. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-8. View