» Articles » PMID: 34820767

The Item-specific Proportion Congruency Effect Can Be Contaminated by Short-term Repetition Priming

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2021 Nov 25
PMID 34820767
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effect reflects the phenomenon that Stroop congruency effects are larger for Stroop items that are more likely to be congruent (MC) than incongruent (MI). While the ISPC effect is purported to reflect long-term memory associations, the proportion manipulation entails that stimulus repetitions vary as a function of the MC and MI conditions, suggesting that a short-term repetition priming process may also contribute. In the present study, we investigated whether the ISPC effect reflected contributions from separate long-term associative learning and short-term repetition priming processes. To do so, the magnitude of the ISPC effect was compared when stimulus repetitions were present and absent. While the ISPC effect was robust, it was revealed that removing stimulus repetitions significantly attenuated the effect. Overall, the present study indicates the ISPC effect can reflect contributions from both short-term repetition and long-term memory processes.

Citing Articles

A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes.

Spinelli G, Lupker S Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(4):1259-1286.

PMID: 38691237 PMC: 11093857. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02892-9.


Accounting for Proportion Congruency Effects in the Stroop Task in a Confounded Setup: Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Episodes Explains it All.

Rothermund K, Gollnick N, Giesen C J Cogn. 2022; 5(1):39.

PMID: 36072098 PMC: 9400611. DOI: 10.5334/joc.232.

References
1.
Aben B, Verguts T, Van den Bussche E . Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017; 43(3):509-517. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000324. View

2.
Bugg J, Dey A . When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018; 44(12):1905-1932. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000580. View

3.
Bugg J, Hutchison K . Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 39(2):433-49. DOI: 10.1037/a0029145. View

4.
Bugg J, Jacoby L, Chanani S . Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 37(3):844-59. DOI: 10.1037/a0019957. View

5.
Cochrane B, Milliken B . The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019; 46(3):252-263. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000713. View