» Articles » PMID: 34818659

Prognoses in Pathologically Confirmed T1 Lower Rectal Cancer Patients with or Without Preoperative Therapy: An Analysis Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

Overview
Journal Oncology
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Nov 24
PMID 34818659
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard therapy for downstaging in locally advanced lower rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear whether rectal cancers downstaged by preoperative therapy show similar prognoses to those of the same stage without preoperative therapy. We previously demonstrated that preoperative CRT did not affect prognosis of rectal cancer with pathological T1N0 (pT1N0) stage in a single institute. Here, using a larger dataset, we compared prognoses of (y)pT1 rectal cancer stratified by the use of preoperative therapy and analyzed prognostic factors.

Methods: Cases of pT1N0 rectal cancer, registered between 2004 and 2016, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were categorized as the "ypT1 group" if they had undergone preoperative therapy before surgery or as the "pT1 group" if they had undergone surgery alone. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between these groups of patients were compared. Factors associated with CSS and OS were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Among 3,757 eligible patients, ypT1 and pT1 groups comprised 720 and 3,037 patients, respectively. While ypT1 patients showed poorer CSS than ypT1 patients, there was no significant difference in OS. Preoperative therapy was not an independent prognostic factor for CSS or OS. Multivariate analysis identified age and histological type as significant factors associated with CSS. Sex, age, race, and number of lymph nodes dissected were identified as significant factors associated with OS.

Conclusions: Prognosis among patients with (y)p T1N0 rectal cancer was similar irrespective of whether they underwent preoperative therapy, which is consistent with our previous observations.

Citing Articles

Analysis of clinical and pathological prognostic factors of survival in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy.

Saad S, Forones N, Lopes Filho G, Waisberg J, Caetano Junior E, Artigiani-Neto R Acta Cir Bras. 2025; 40:e401125.

PMID: 39936724 PMC: 11810072. DOI: 10.1590/acb401125.


A nomogram based on the log odds of positive lymph nodes for predicting the prognosis of T1 stage rectal cancer.

Guo Z, Li W, Wu K, Fu Y, Yan R, Zhou X Am J Cancer Res. 2023; 13(4):1498-1508.

PMID: 37168349 PMC: 10164795.

References
1.
Nissan A, Guillem J, Paty P, Wong W, Cohen A . Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum: a matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42(9):1176-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF02238570. View

2.
Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P, Wang L, Chen W, Cui L . Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil Plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Final Results of the Chinese FOWARC Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(34):3223-3233. PMC: 6881102. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.02309. View

3.
Schmoll H, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K . ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23(10):2479-2516. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds236. View

4.
Majek O, Gondos A, Jansen L, Emrich K, Holleczek B, Katalinic A . Sex differences in colorectal cancer survival: population-based analysis of 164,996 colorectal cancer patients in Germany. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e68077. PMC: 3702575. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068077. View

5.
Dossa F, Acuna S, Rickles A, Berho M, Wexner S, Quereshy F . Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Rectal Cancer and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Resection. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(7):930-937. PMC: 6145724. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5597. View