CNVpytor: a Tool for Copy Number Variation Detection and Analysis from Read Depth and Allele Imbalance in Whole-genome Sequencing

Overview

Journal Gigascience

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialties Biology
Genetics

Date 2021 Nov 24

PMID 34817058

Citations 40

Authors

Milovan Suvakov

Arijit Panda

Colin Diesh

Ian Holmes

Alexej Abyzov

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Detecting copy number variations (CNVs) and copy number alterations (CNAs) based on whole-genome sequencing data is important for personalized genomics and treatment. CNVnator is one of the most popular tools for CNV/CNA discovery and analysis based on read depth.

Findings: Herein, we present an extension of CNVnator developed in Python-CNVpytor. CNVpytor inherits the reimplemented core engine of its predecessor and extends visualization, modularization, performance, and functionality. Additionally, CNVpytor uses B-allele frequency likelihood information from single-nucleotide polymorphisms and small indels data as additional evidence for CNVs/CNAs and as primary information for copy number-neutral losses of heterozygosity.

Conclusions: CNVpytor is significantly faster than CNVnator-particularly for parsing alignment files (2-20 times faster)-and has (20-50 times) smaller intermediate files. CNV calls can be filtered using several criteria, annotated, and merged over multiple samples. Modular architecture allows it to be used in shared and cloud environments such as Google Colab and Jupyter notebook. Data can be exported into JBrowse, while a lightweight plugin version of CNVpytor for JBrowse enables nearly instant and GUI-assisted analysis of CNVs by any user. CNVpytor release and the source code are available on GitHub at https://github.com/abyzovlab/CNVpytor under the MIT license.

Citing Articles

Pivotal role of biallelic frequency analysis in identifying copy number alterations using genome-wide methods in tumors with a high level of aneuploidy.

Rymuza J, Woroniecka R, Grygalewicz B, Bujko M J Appl Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 40036001 DOI: 10.1007/s13353-025-00951-x.

Somatic DNA Variants in Epilepsy Surgery Brain Samples from Patients with Lesional Epilepsy.

Schwarz J, Becker L, Wahle M, Fassbender J, Thomale U, Tietze A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2.

PMID: 39859528 PMC: 11766355. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020815.

Genomic analyses reveal high diversity and rapid evolution of within a neonatal intensive care unit in Delhi, India.

Jain K, Wang Y, Jain P, Kalita B, Shivarathri R, Chauhan M Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025; 69(3):e0170924.

PMID: 39853119 PMC: 11881565. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01709-24.

A Comprehensive Bioinformatics Approach to Analysis of Variants: Variant Calling, Annotation, and Prioritization.

Koroglu M, Bilguvar K Methods Mol Biol. 2025; 2889:207-233.

PMID: 39745615 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4322-8_15.

High level of aneuploidy and recurrent loss of chromosome 11 as relevant features of somatotroph pituitary tumors.

Rymuza J, Kober P, Maksymowicz M, Nyc A, Mossakowska B, Woroniecka R J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):994.

PMID: 39497133 PMC: 11536836. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05736-0.

References

Hermsen R, de Ligt J, Spee W, Blokzijl F, Schafer S, Adami E . Genomic landscape of rat strain and substrain variation. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16:357. PMC: 4422378. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1594-1. View

Wallace J, Bradbury P, Zhang N, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Buckler E . Association mapping across numerous traits reveals patterns of functional variation in maize. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10(12):e1004845. PMC: 4256217. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004845. View

Sudmant P, Rausch T, Gardner E, Handsaker R, Abyzov A, Huddleston J . An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature. 2015; 526(7571):75-81. PMC: 4617611. DOI: 10.1038/nature15394. View

Zhu M, Need A, Han Y, Ge D, Maia J, Zhu Q . Using ERDS to infer copy-number variants in high-coverage genomes. Am J Hum Genet. 2012; 91(3):408-21. PMC: 3511991. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.07.004. View

Gokcumen O, Tischler V, Tica J, Zhu Q, Iskow R, Lee E . Primate genome architecture influences structural variation mechanisms and functional consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(39):15764-9. PMC: 3785719. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305904110. View

Guo H, Duyzend M, Coe B, Baker C, Hoekzema K, Gerdts J . Genome sequencing identifies multiple deleterious variants in autism patients with more severe phenotypes. Genet Med. 2018; 21(7):1611-1620. PMC: 6546556. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0380-2. View

Legault M, Girard S, Lemieux Perreault L, Rouleau G, Dube M . Comparison of sequencing based CNV discovery methods using monozygotic twin quartets. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0122287. PMC: 4374778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122287. View

Han L, Zhao X, Benton M, Perumal T, Collins R, Hoffman G . Functional annotation of rare structural variation in the human brain. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):2990. PMC: 7293301. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16736-1. View

Auton A, Brooks L, Durbin R, Garrison E, Kang H, Korbel J . A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015; 526(7571):68-74. PMC: 4750478. DOI: 10.1038/nature15393. View

10.

Loh P, Genovese G, Handsaker R, Finucane H, Reshef Y, Palamara P . Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature. 2018; 559(7714):350-355. PMC: 6054542. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0321-x. View

11.

Peiffer D, Le J, Steemers F, Chang W, Jenniges T, Garcia F . High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res. 2006; 16(9):1136-48. PMC: 1557768. DOI: 10.1101/gr.5402306. View

12.

Nagasaki M, Yasuda J, Katsuoka F, Nariai N, Kojima K, Kawai Y . Rare variant discovery by deep whole-genome sequencing of 1,070 Japanese individuals. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:8018. PMC: 4560751. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9018. View

13.

Kim M, Druliner B, Vasmatzis N, Bae T, Chia N, Abyzov A . Inferring modes of evolution from colorectal cancer with residual polyp of origin. Oncotarget. 2018; 9(6):6780-6792. PMC: 5805514. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23687. View

14.

Fuentes R, Chebotarov D, Duitama J, Smith S, de la Hoz J, Mohiyuddin M . Structural variants in 3000 rice genomes. Genome Res. 2019; 29(5):870-880. PMC: 6499320. DOI: 10.1101/gr.241240.118. View

15.

Chain F, Feulner P, Panchal M, Eizaguirre C, Samonte I, Kalbe M . Extensive copy-number variation of young genes across stickleback populations. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10(12):e1004830. PMC: 4256280. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004830. View

16.

Gordon S, Priest H, Des Marais D, Schackwitz W, Figueroa M, Martin J . Genome diversity in Brachypodium distachyon: deep sequencing of highly diverse inbred lines. Plant J. 2014; 79(3):361-74. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12569. View

17.

Pezer Z, Harr B, Teschke M, Babiker H, Tautz D . Divergence patterns of genic copy number variation in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) reveal three conserved genes with major population-specific expansions. Genome Res. 2015; 25(8):1114-24. PMC: 4509996. DOI: 10.1101/gr.187187.114. View

18.

Coll F, Preston M, Guerra-Assuncao J, Hill-Cawthorn G, Harris D, Perdigao J . PolyTB: a genomic variation map for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014; 94(3):346-54. PMC: 4066953. DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.02.005. View

19.

Boeva V, Popova T, Bleakley K, Chiche P, Cappo J, Schleiermacher G . Control-FREEC: a tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011; 28(3):423-5. PMC: 3268243. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr670. View

20.

Yi G, Qu L, Liu J, Yan Y, Xu G, Yang N . Genome-wide patterns of copy number variation in the diversified chicken genomes using next-generation sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2014; 15:962. PMC: 4239369. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-962. View