» Articles » PMID: 34809581

Intubation Using VieScope Vs. Video Laryngoscopy in Full Personal Protective Equipment - a Randomized, Controlled Simulation Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Anesthesiol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2021 Nov 23
PMID 34809581
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: VieScope is a new type of laryngoscope, with a straight, transparent and illuminated blade, allowing for direct line of sight towards the larynx. In addition, VieScope is disposed of after single patient use, which can avoid cross-contaminations of contagious material. This has gained importance especially when treating patients with highly contagious infectious diseases, such as during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. In this context, VieScope has not been evaluated yet in a clinical study.

Material And Methods: This study compared intubation with VieScope to video-laryngoscopy (GlideScope) in normal and difficult airway in a standardized airway manikin in a randomized controlled simulation trial. Thirty-five medical specialists were asked to perform endotracheal intubation in full personal protective equipment (PPE). Primary endpoint was correct tube position. First-pass rate (i.e., success rate at the first attempt), time until intubation and time until first correct ventilation were registered as secondary endpoints.

Results: For correct tracheal tube placement, there was no significant difference between VieScope and GlideScope in normal and difficult airway conditions. VieScope had over 91% fist-pass success rate in normal airway setting. VieScope had a comparable success rate to GlideScope in difficult airway, but had a significantly longer time until intubation and time until ventilation.

Conclusion: VieScope and GlideScope had high success rates in normal as well as in difficult airway. There was no unrecognized esophageal intubation in either group. Overall time for intubation was longer in the VieScope group, though in an acceptable range given in literature. Results from this simulation study suggest that VieScope may be an acceptable alternative for tracheal intubation in full PPE.

Trial Registration: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register www.drks.de (Registration date: 09/11/2020; TrialID: DRKS00023406 ).

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Factors Affecting Illumination Intensity in Lightwand Endotracheal Intubation.

Hong K, Lee J, Hwang H, Sim W, Park H, Lee J In Vivo. 2023; 38(1):490-495.

PMID: 38148078 PMC: 10756448. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13464.


Impact of VieScope® on first-attempt success during simulated COVID-19 patients intubation: A randomized cross-over simulation trial.

Evrin T, Ozturk Sonmez L, Gadek L, Pruc M, Navolokina A, Wieczorek W Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023; 29(4):463-470.

PMID: 36995204 PMC: 10214889. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.45682.


Assessment of the Possibility of Using the Laryngoscopes Macintosh, McCoy, Miller, Intubrite, VieScope and I-View for Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions by People without Clinical Experience: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

Ratajczyk P, Kluj P, Dolder P, Szmyd B, Gaszynski T Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(5).

PMID: 36900666 PMC: 10000538. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11050661.


A Comparison of the bébé VieScope™ and Direct Laryngoscope for Use While Wearing PPE-AGP: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Trial.

Wieczorek P, Szarpak L, Dabrowska A, Pruc M, Navolokina A, Raczynski A Children (Basel). 2022; 9(11).

PMID: 36421223 PMC: 9689205. DOI: 10.3390/children9111774.

References
1.
Wu Z, McGoogan J . Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020; 323(13):1239-1242. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. View

2.
Schroeder D, Wetsch W, Finke S, Dusse F, Bottiger B, Herff H . Apneic laryngeal oxygenation during elective fiberoptic intubation - a technical simulation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020; 20(1):300. PMC: 7724726. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01216-2. View

3.
Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T . Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010; 54(9):1050-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02285.x. View

4.
Lewis S, Butler A, Parker J, Cook T, Smith A . Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11:CD011136. PMC: 6472630. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2. View

5.
Lee D, Ma M, Parotto M, Wasowicz M . Intubation outside of the operating room: new challenges and opportunities in COVID-19 era. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020; 33(4):608-611. PMC: 7363387. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000892. View