Clinical Effectiveness of Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Varicocele

Overview

Journal Transl Androl Urol

Date 2021 Nov 22

PMID 34804828

Citations 4

Authors

Xiaobin Wang

Ruipeng Wang

Qiang Du

Bochen Pan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Varicocele (VC) is one of the most common causes of infertility in men, and microscopic varicocelectomy is currently the major surgical procedure for VC. We assessed the clinical effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of VC in terms of semen quality improvement rate, pregnancy rate, pain relief rate, recurrence rate, and complication rate after MSV and explored the indications for VC surgery.

Methods: In total, 216 patients undergoing MSV in our center between June 2019 and July 2020 were enrolled in this study. All patients received the surgery under local anesthesia and were admitted and discharged within 24 hours. All patients were followed up for more than 6 months, and the rates of semen quality improvement, pregnancy, pain relief, recurrence, and postoperative complications were recorded. We can evaluate the pain degree of patients through the numerical rating scale (NRS). (I) 0 points for painless; (II) 13: mild pain; (III) 46: moderate pain; (IV) 710 points are severe pain. 0 is the most slightly, indicating comfort, and 10 is the most painful and unbearable.

Results: The sperm concentration, total sperm count, progressive motility rate, sperm viability, and morphology were significantly improved after the surgery (all P values <0.05). The rate of semen quality improvement was 88.2%, and the semen indicators returned to normal in 26.6% of the patients. Among the patients who were followed up for 1 year, the natural conception rate reached 27.1% and was accompanied by a 95.5% pain relief rate, a 0.5% VC recurrence rate, and a 2.3% postoperative complication rate.We obtained data through laboratory examination of semen DNA fragments index (DFI). Compared with preoperative and postoperative DFI, postoperative DFI was improved, and the pregnancy outcome was improved.

Conclusions: MSV under local anesthesia increases the rates of semen quality improvement, pregnancy, and pain relief while lowering the rates of recurrence and postoperative complications. MSV may also help to improve the pregnancy outcomes in patients with VC accompanied by sperm DNA fragmentation or nonobstructive azoospermia, but this should be verified by further investigation.

Citing Articles

The effect of spermatic cord block on reducing the risk of vagal reflex during microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy: A randomized trial.

Gao Q, Wu N, Li Y, Dai Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34414.

PMID: 39108892 PMC: 11301332. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34414.

Efficacy of transversalis fascia plane block as a novel ındication for varicocelectomy surgery: prospective randomized controlled study.

Celik E, Ozbey I, Aydin M, Yayik A, Ahiskalioglu E, Tor I BMC Anesthesiol. 2023; 23(1):48.

PMID: 36750790 PMC: 9903451. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02009-z.

Effects of alpha-lipoic acid on sperm quality in patients with varicocele-related male infertility: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Zhang Q, Wang S, Zhang H, Liu Q, Wei Y, Deng W Trials. 2022; 23(1):1002.

PMID: 36510262 PMC: 9746131. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06951-0.

The Application Effect of Jiawei Sanyu Shengjing Decoction Combined with High Ligation of the Spermatic Vein in Varicocele Male Infertility Patients.

Lu X, Han H, Zhang Z, Chen H, Huang X, Zhang R Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022; 2022:2629140.

PMID: 36032045 PMC: 9410973. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2629140.

References

Ding H, Tian J, Du W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang Z . Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int. 2012; 110(10):1536-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11093.x. View

Peterson A, Lance R, Ruiz H . Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain. J Urol. 1998; 159(5):1565-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199805000-00043. View

Guo L, Sun W, Shao G, Song H, Ge N, Zhao S . Outcomes of Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy With and Without the Assistance of Doppler Ultrasound: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Urology. 2015; 86(5):922-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.002. View

Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H . Surgical comparison of subinguinal and high inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for adolescent varicocele. Int J Urol. 2016; 23(4):338-42. DOI: 10.1111/iju.13050. View

Han D, Yang Q, Chen X, Ouyang B, Yao B, Liu G . Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016; 48(7):1071-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1246-7. View

Al-Kandari A, Khudair A, Arafa A, Zanaty F, Ezz A, El-Shazly M . Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: Spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis. Arab J Urol. 2018; 16(1):181-187. PMC: 5922226. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.12.002. View

Paick S, Choi W . Varicocele and Testicular Pain: A Review. World J Mens Health. 2018; 37(1):4-11. PMC: 6305863. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.170010. View

Cocuzza M, Pagani R, Coelho R, Srougi M, Hallak J . The systematic use of intraoperative vascular Doppler ultrasound during microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy improves precise identification and preservation of testicular blood supply. Fertil Steril. 2009; 93(7):2396-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.088. View

Yuan R, Zhuo H, Cao D, Wei Q . Efficacy and safety of varicocelectomies: A meta-analysis. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2017; 63(2):120-129. DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2016.1265161. View

10.

Al-Kandari A, Shabaan H, Ibrahim H, Elshebiny Y, Shokeir A . Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2007; 69(3):417-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.057. View

11.

Zini A, Fischer A, Bellack D, Noss M, Kamal K, Chow V . Technical modification of microsurgical varicocelectomy can reduce operating time. Urology. 2006; 67(4):803-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.044. View

12.

Cayan S, Acar D, Ulger S, Akbay E . Adolescent varicocele repair: long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital. J Urol. 2005; 174(5):2003-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000176488.44895.7b. View

13.

Lund L, Larsen S . A follow-up study of semen quality and fertility in men with varicocele testis and in control subjects. Br J Urol. 1998; 82(5):682-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00850.x. View

14.

Lv K, Zhuang J, Zhao L, Wan Z, Zhang Y, Gao Y . Varicocele anatomy during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in Chinese men. Andrologia. 2015; 47(10):1190-5. DOI: 10.1111/and.12402. View

15.

Cho C, Esteves S, Agarwal A . Indications and outcomes of varicocele repair. Panminerva Med. 2019; 61(2):152-163. DOI: 10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03528-0. View

16.

Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins J, Nygren K . International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6):1506-12. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. View

17.

Alacadag M, Cilingir D . Presurgery Anxiety and Day Surgery Patients' Need for Information. J Perianesth Nurs. 2018; 33(5):658-668. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2017.06.125. View

18.

Barratt C, Bjorndahl L, De Jonge C, Lamb D, Osorio Martini F, McLachlan R . The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2017; 23(6):660-680. PMC: 5850791. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx021. View

19.

Majholm B, Engbaek J, Bartholdy J, Oerding H, Ahlburg P, Ulrik A . Is day surgery safe? A Danish multicentre study of morbidity after 57,709 day surgery procedures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56(3):323-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02631.x. View

20.

Zhang M, Sun P, Liu M, Jiang Z, Fu Z, Min D . A case report of a woman after childbirth with a dehisced abdominal wound as well as fat liquefaction and large skin necrosis. Ann Palliat Med. 2020; 9(2):493-496. DOI: 10.21037/apm.2020.03.15. View