Humeral Shaft Fractures: How Effective Really is Functional Bracing?

Overview

Journal Shoulder Elbow

Date 2021 Nov 22

PMID 34804211

Citations 2

Authors

Cezary Kocialkowski

Barnaby Sheridan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of functional bracing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures and identify factors that increased the risk of delayed or non-union.

Methods: All patients with humeral shaft fractures treated at Musgrove Park Hospital between 2010 and 2017 were identified. Patient electronic records were reviewed to identify demographic data, as well as outcomes and complications following treatment. Radiographs were reviewed to identify fracture pattern and location as well as fracture displacement and angulation.

Results: In total, 65 patients were treated with functional bracing of which 22 patients (34%) had a delayed or non-union. Fracture displacement and angulation were significantly associated with delayed or non-union. In particular, patients with fractures displaced more than 30 mm or angulated more than 30° had a significantly higher risk of delayed or non-union. Fracture location or pattern was not significantly associated with delayed or non-union.

Conclusion: Functional bracing is an effective treatment modality for the majority of patients with humeral shaft fractures, but patients with markedly displaced or angulated fractures are at a higher risk of failure of conservative treatment and therefore early operative intervention should be considered.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Derbas J, Moghamis I, Alzobi O, Elshoeibi A, Murshid A, Ahmed G Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):63.

PMID: 39915345 PMC: 11802612. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04181-z.

Clinical effect of operative nonoperative treatment on humeral shaft fractures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Li Y, Luo Y, Peng J, Fan J, Long X World J Orthop. 2024; 15(8):783-795.

PMID: 39165869 PMC: 11331324. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.783.

Medial minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: a case series.

Liu D, Liang J Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023; 85(6):3171-3178.

PMID: 37363563 PMC: 10289522. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000852.

References

Updegrove G, Mourad W, Abboud J . Humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(4):e87-e97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.028. View

Sarmiento A, Kinman P, Galvin E, Schmitt R, Phillips J . Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59(5):596-601. View

Pidhorz L . Acute and chronic humeral shaft fractures in adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101(1 Suppl):S41-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.034. View

Sarmiento A, Zagorski J, Zych G, Latta L, Capps C . Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(4):478-86. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00003. View

Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts C, Karam M, Kellam J . Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. View

Neuhaus V, Menendez M, Kurylo J, Dyer G, Jawa A, Ring D . Risk factors for fracture mobility six weeks after initiation of brace treatment of mid-diaphyseal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(5):403-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00089. View

Bhandari M, Devereaux P, McKee M, Schemitsch E . Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures--a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2006; 77(2):279-84. DOI: 10.1080/17453670610046037. View

Rutgers M, Ring D . Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20(9):597-601. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000249423.48074.82. View

Koch P, Gross D, Gerber C . The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.121634. View

10.

Decomas A, Kaye J . Risk factors associated with failure of treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures after functional bracing. J La State Med Soc. 2010; 162(1):33-5. View

11.

Ekholm R, Tidermark J, Tornkvist H, Adami J, Ponzer S . Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20(9):591-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000246466.01287.04. View

12.

Ali E, Griffiths D, Obi N, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Van Rensburg L . Nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 24(2):210-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.009. View

13.

Ring D, Chin K, Taghinia A, Jupiter J . Nonunion after functional brace treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Trauma. 2007; 62(5):1157-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000222719.52619.2c. View

14.

Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M . Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(5):833-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.030. View

15.

Shields E, Sundem L, Childs S, Maceroli M, Humphrey C, Ketz J . The impact of residual angulation on patient reported functional outcome scores after non-operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures. Injury. 2016; 47(4):914-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.014. View

16.

Harkin F, Large R . Humeral shaft fractures: union outcomes in a large cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(11):1881-1888. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.001. View

17.

Mahabier K, Vogels L, Punt B, Roukema G, Patka P, Van Lieshout E . Humeral shaft fractures: retrospective results of non-operative and operative treatment of 186 patients. Injury. 2012; 44(4):427-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.003. View