» Articles » PMID: 34804082

Revisiting Why Plants Become N Deficient Under Elevated CO: Importance to Meet N Demand Regardless of the Fed-Form

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2021 Nov 22
PMID 34804082
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An increase in plant biomass under elevated CO (eCO) is usually lower than expected. N-deficiency induced by eCO is often considered to be a reason for this. Several hypotheses explain the induced N-deficiency: (1) eCO inhibits nitrate assimilation, (2) eCO lowers nitrate acquisition due to reduced transpiration, or (3) eCO reduces plant N concentration with increased biomass. We tested them using C (wheat, rice, and potato) and C plants (guinea grass, and ) grown in chambers at 400 (ambient CO, aCO) or 800 (eCO) μL L CO. In most species, we could not confirm hypothesis (1) with the measurements of plant nitrate accumulation in each organ. The exception was rice showing a slight inhibition of nitrate assimilation at eCO, but the biomass was similar between the nitrate and urea-fed plants. Contrary to hypothesis (2), eCO did not decrease plant nitrate acquisition despite reduced transpiration because of enhanced nitrate acquisition per unit transpiration in all species. Comparing to aCO, eCO remarkably enhanced water-use efficiency, especially in C plants, decreasing water demand for CO acquisition. As our results supported hypothesis (3) without any exception, we then examined if lowered N concentration at eCO indeed limits the growth using C wheat and C guinea grass under various levels of nitrate-N supply. While eCO significantly increased relative growth rate (RGR) in wheat but not in guinea grass, each species increased RGR with higher N supply and then reached a maximum as no longer N was limited. To achieve the maximum RGR, wheat required a 1.3-fold N supply at eCO than aCO with 2.2-fold biomass. However, the N requirement by guinea grass was less affected by the eCO treatment. The results reveal that accelerated RGR by eCO could create a demand for more N, especially in the leaf sheath rather than the leaf blade in wheat, causing N-limitation unless the additional N was supplied. We concluded that eCO amplifies N-limitation due to accelerated growth rate rather than inhibited nitrate assimilation or acquisition. Our results suggest that plant growth under higher CO will become more dependent on N but less dependent on water to acquire both CO and N.

Citing Articles

Microcontroller-based water control system for evaluating crop water use characteristics.

Sugiura D, Mitsuya S, Takahashi H, Yamamoto R, Miyazawa Y Plant Methods. 2024; 20(1):179.

PMID: 39582011 PMC: 11585949. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-024-01305-0.


The enhancement of photosynthetic performance, water use efficiency and potato yield under elevated CO is cultivar dependent.

Dahal K, Milne M, Gervais T Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1287825.

PMID: 38046606 PMC: 10690597. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1287825.


Will crops with biological nitrification inhibition capacity be favored under future atmospheric CO?.

Vega-Mas I, Ascencio-Medina E, Bozal-Leorri A, Gonzalez-Murua C, Marino D, Gonzalez-Moro M Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1245427.

PMID: 37692431 PMC: 10484480. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1245427.


Triose phosphate utilization in leaves is modulated by whole-plant sink-source ratios and nitrogen budgets in rice.

Zhou Z, Zhang Z, van der Putten P, Fabre D, Dingkuhn M, Struik P J Exp Bot. 2023; 74(21):6692-6707.

PMID: 37642225 PMC: 10662237. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad329.


The Mechanisms Responsible for N Deficiency in Well-Watered Wheat Under Elevated CO.

Fan J, Halpern M, Yu Y, Zuo Q, Shi J, Fan Y Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:801443.

PMID: 35251079 PMC: 8888439. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.801443.


References
1.
Feng Z, Rutting T, Pleijel H, Wallin G, Reich P, Kammann C . Constraints to nitrogen acquisition of terrestrial plants under elevated CO2. Glob Chang Biol. 2015; 21(8):3152-68. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12938. View

2.
Wheeler R, Tibbitts T, Fitzpatrick A . Carbon dioxide effects on potato growth under different photoperiods and irradiance. Crop Sci. 1991; 31(5):1209-13. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183x003100050026x. View

3.
Long S, Ainsworth E, Rogers A, Ort D . Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004; 55:591-628. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610. View

4.
Burnett A, Rogers A, Rees M, Osborne C . Carbon source-sink limitations differ between two species with contrasting growth strategies. Plant Cell Environ. 2016; 39(11):2460-2472. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12801. View

5.
Tausz-Posch S, Tausz M, Bourgault M . Elevated [CO ] effects on crops: Advances in understanding acclimation, nitrogen dynamics and interactions with drought and other organisms. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2019; 22 Suppl 1:38-51. DOI: 10.1111/plb.12994. View