» Articles » PMID: 34803520

Integrating Regional and Local Monitoring Data and Assessment Tools to Evaluate Habitat Conditions and Inform River Restoration

Overview
Journal Ecol Indic
Date 2021 Nov 22
PMID 34803520
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Restoring degraded rivers requires initial assessment of the fluvial landscape to identify stressors and riverine features that can be enhanced. We associated local-scale river habitat data collected using standardized national monitoring tools with modeled regional water temperature and flow data on mid-sized northwest U.S. rivers (30-60 m wide). We grouped these rivers according to quartiles of their modeled mean August water temperature and examined their physical habitat structure and flow. We then used principal components analysis to summarize the variation in several dimensions of physical habitat. We also compared local conditions in the Priest River, a river targeted for restoration of native salmonid habitat in northern Idaho, with those in other rivers of the region to infer potential drivers controlling water temperature. The warmest rivers had physical structure and fluvial characteristics typical of thermally degraded rivers, whereas the coldest rivers had higher mean summer flows and greater channel planform complexity. The Priest River sites had approximately twice as many deep residual pools (50, 75, and 100 cm) and incision that averaged approximately twice that in the coldest rivers. Percentage fines and natural cover in the Priest were also more typical of the higher-temperature river groups. We found generally low instream cover and low levels of large wood both across the region and within the Priest River. Our approach enabled us to consider the local habitat conditions of a river in the context of other similarly sized rivers in the surrounding region. Understanding this context is important for identifying potential influences on river water temperature within the focal basin and for defining attainable goals for management and restoration of thermal and habitat conditions.

Citing Articles

Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and rivers, Part 1: Geoclimatic controls and anthropogenic alteration.

Kaufmann P, Hughes R, Paulsen S, Peck D, Seeliger C, Weber M Ecol Indic. 2022; 141:109046.

PMID: 35991319 PMC: 9389819. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109046.

References
1.
Kamp U, Binder W, Holzl K . River habitat monitoring and assessment in Germany. Environ Monit Assess. 2006; 127(1-3):209-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9274-x. View

2.
Jones L, Schoen E, Shaftel R, Cunningham C, Mauger S, Rinella D . Watershed-scale climate influences productivity of Chinook salmon populations across southcentral Alaska. Glob Chang Biol. 2020; 26(9):4919-4936. PMC: 7496363. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15155. View

3.
Hall J, Greene C, Stefankiv O, Anderson J, Timpane-Padgham B, Beechie T . Large river habitat complexity and productivity of Puget Sound Chinook salmon. PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0205127. PMC: 6211665. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205127. View

4.
Reid A, Carlson A, Creed I, Eliason E, Gell P, Johnson P . Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018; 94(3):849-873. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12480. View

5.
Woodward G, Perkins D, Brown L . Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: impacts across multiple levels of organization. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1549):2093-106. PMC: 2880135. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0055. View